Creative sector as a source of small spatial effects: a methodological approach for a resource-based microregion

Regional and branch economy
Authors:
Abstract:

Creative industries are increasingly becoming involved in regional entrepreneurial and spatial development, gradually moving beyond the cultural sphere. Their influence is reflected not only in the creation of cultural products and new forms of employment, but also in the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, tourism, digital services, and local markets. This increases the need for a methodological approach that can assess both the scale of the creative sector and the additional socio-economic effects it generates in remote regions with a predominantly resource- based specialization. The aim of the article is to substantiate and test a methodological approach to assessing the potential of the creative sector and its associated entrepreneurial and tourism effects, taking into account digital, social and labor, and institutional conditions. The empirical base is a balanced panel of 11 regions of the Far Eastern Federal District covering 2019−2025. The research object is the creative sector of the Far Eastern regions, interpreted as an element of the macroregion’s spatial development system. The year 2019, the last pre-pandemic year, is used as the base year for index calculations; this ensures the comparability of time series and makes it possible to account for the changes that occurred in regional economies in 2020−2025. The data are drawn from official statistics and the Unified Register of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Methodologically, the study is based on a «resource — channel — effect» framework involving a step-by-step analysis of the creative sector’s initial resources, the mechanisms of their economic realization and the resulting socio-economic outcomes. The toolkit includes the normalization of indicators grouped into five blocks — resource, digital, market, social and labor, and institutional — as well as a set of econometric procedures. The main stages are the preparation and normalization of the initial dataset, construction of an integral creative-sector potential index, estimation of panel models with fixed effects and robustness testing. The proposed approach differs from conventional methods focused mainly on the direct contribution of creative industries to gross regional product (GRP) by emphasizing the accompanying effects of their development. The calculations indicate a statistically robust positive association between the share of creative-economy gross value added in GRP and indicators of small and medium-sized enterprise development and tourist flows. The integral index provides a more detailed picture of interregional differences in creative-sector development. The proposed methodological framework can support public authorities in designing measures for creative-industry development, setting regional priorities, and monitoring and evaluating regional creative-sector programs.

Funding:

The article was prepared within the research work of the Finance and Economic Institute of M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University (R&D registration No. АААА-А21-121010890095-8).

  • References

    1. Florida R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class, New York: Basic Books.

    2. Landry C. (2000) The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators, London: Earthscan.

    3. Howkins J. (2002) The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas, London: Penguin Books.

    4. Pratt A.C. (2008) Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Anna- ler: Series B, Human Geography, 90 (2), 107–117. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00281.x

    5. Viganò F., England L., Comunian R. (2023) Connecting craft, design and the wood industry in South Tyrol: From clusters to creative ecosystem. Journal of Rural Studies, 104, art. no. 103149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103149

    6. Duxbury N., Durrer V., Sitas R. (2024) Cultural policy actions towards urban sustainability: Research and practice collaborations. City, Culture and Society, 37, art. no. 100584. DOI: 10.1016/j. ccs.2024.100584

    7. Tao Ma, YueNing Wang, Li Zhang, Wuyang Hong, Xiaochun Yang (2025) Creative assets, people, and places: Rural art action practices of US nonprofit organizations. Journal of Rural Studies, 113, art. no. 103476. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103476

    8. Freitas R.G., Davel E., Bérubé J. (2025) Managing cultural projects: Plural creativity as creative practice. International Journal of Project Management, 43 (3), art. no. 102708. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102708

    9. Goya D. (2024) Marshallian and Jacobian externalities in creative industries: Evidence from Chile. Papers in Regional Science, 103 (4), art. no. 100028. DOI: 10.1016/j.pirs.2024.100028

    10. Gao H. (2025) The impact of digital economy development on the performance of digital crea- tive enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 84, art. no. 107761. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107761

    11. Chen J.S. (2015) Tourism stakeholders attitudes toward sustainable development: A case in the Arctic. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 225–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.08.003

    12. Chen J.S., Chen Y.-L. (2016) Tourism stakeholders’ perceptions of service gaps in Arctic destinations: Lessons from Norway’s Finnmark region. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 16, 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2016.04.006

    13. Fox S., Huntington H.P., Stammler F. et al. (2024) Community knowledge exchange in research leads to innovation and action in the Arctic. Arctic Science, 11, 1–12. DOI: 10.1139/as-2024-0015

    14. Islam N., Sadhukhan S. (2025) Relationship among creative tourism development strategies, creative industries, and activities: A case study of Lucknow, India. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 36, art. no. 100988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100988

    15. Anantrasirichai N., Bull D. (2022) Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review. Arti- ficial Intelligence Review, 55, 589–656. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7

    16. Epstein Z., Hertzmann A. (2023) Art and the science of generative AI. Science, 380 (6650), 1110–1111. DOI: 10.1126/science.adh4451

    17. Akimova O.E., Volkov S.K., Simonov A.B. (2024) Methodology for Analyzing and Assessing the Efficiency of the Impact of Creative Centers on Improving the Population’s Quality of Life in Rural Territories. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 17 (3), 416–429.

    18. Antonova I., Maleeva E. (2023) Spillover Effect of Creative Industry: Definition, Types, Evalua- tion Indicators. Rossiiskie regiony v fokuse peremen [Russian regions in the spotlight of change], 710–712.

    19. Mikhaylova A.V., Fedorova A.V., Petrova N.N., Petrova N.I. (2024) Assessing the potential of creative industries in the Russian Arctic. Creative Economy, 18 (3), 675–696. DOI: 10.18334/ce.18. 3.120607

    20. Mikhaylova A.V., Shkurko N.S. (2023) The role of creative spaces and creative tourism in Russian regions in creatosphere formation. Creative Economy, 17 (8), 2873–2886. DOI: 10.18334/ce.17. 8.118767

    21. Mikhailova A.V., Popova L.N. (2024) Kreatosfera v Arkticheskikh regionakh Rossii [Kreatosphere in the arctic regions of Russia]. Konkurentosposobnost' v global'nom mire: ekonomika, nauka, tekh- nologii [Competitiveness in the global world: economy, science, technology], 4, 231–235.

    22. Karpova G.A., Valeeva E.O. (2015) Tourism development as the competitive advantage of the territory (on the example of the Northwest Federal District subjects). Izvestiâ Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo èkonomičeskogo universiteta, 1 (91), 44–51.

    23. Karpova G.A., Kuchumov A.V., Sirenko O.O., Eremicheva P.Yu. (2024) The main trends in the development of digital entrepreneurship in tourism. Services in Russia and Abroad, 18 (3), 16–25. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14254290

    24. Karpova G., Khodanova A. (2023) Assessment of the impact of cultural and event events on the attractive potential of the destination. The Professors’ Magazine. Recreation and Tourism Series, 1 (17), 41–47. DOI: 10.18572/2686-858X-2023-17-1-41-47

    25. Bogachev V.F., Mikulenok A.S. (2024) Mezhregional'naia integratsiia arkticheskikh territorii [Interregional integration of Arctic territories]. Nauka i tekhnologii v transformatsii sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo landshafta [Science and technology in the transformation of the socio-economic landscape], 11–13. DOI: 10.53115/9785001885337

    26. Pilyasov A.N. (2024) Composition of Arctic Territories for State Support: Which Way to Choose? Arctic and North, 56, 92–111. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2024.56.92

    27. Volkov A.D., Roslyakova N.A., Sleptsov R.S., Nikitina A.S. (2024) A method for measuring the performance of the Russian Arctic as a special economic zone: Accounting for regional specificities. The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, 3, 7–26. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.3.2024.85.001

    28. Koroleva A.A. (2017) Marketing analysis of the potential of creative industries in the urban envi- ronment. Creative Economy, 11 (4), 445–456. DOI: 10.18334/ce.11.4.37759

    29. Sokornov I.N. (2025) Methodology of research in the creative industries. Creative Economy, 19 (2), 277–302. DOI: 10.18334/ce.19.2.122560

    30. Khestanov R. (2018) Creative Industries – Models of Development. Russian Sociological Review, 17 (3), 173–196. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2018-3-173-196

    31. Bredikhin S.V., Vlasova V.V., Gavrilova N.V., Gershman M.A., Gokhberg L.M., Dem’ianova A.V., Ivanova I.A., Popova Ia.A. (2021) Razvitie kreativnykh industrii v Rossii: kliuchevye indikatory [Development of creative industries in Russia: key indicators], Moscow: NIU VSHE.

     

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article