Interregional cooperation as a tool for reducing spatial differentiation: governance mechanisms and success factors

Regional and branch economy
Authors:
Abstract:

This article examines interregional cooperation as a strategic instrument for reducing spatial differentiation in the Russian Federation. The relevance of the study is due to the persistence of significant regional disparities despite the prolonged use of equalization policies, highlighting the need for mechanisms that move beyond redistributive approaches toward coordinated development. The aim of the study is to identify governance mechanisms of vertical and horizontal cooperation and determine the factors that ensure their effectiveness in reducing spatial inequality. The central hypothesis is that the success of interregional initiatives depends on the presence of structured governance mechanisms capable of ensuring institutional synergy and overcoming administrative fragmentation. The research is based on a qualitative case study methodology. Four successful interregional projects are analyzed: the West Siberian Interregional Research and Education Center, the Oil and Gas Cluster of Tyumen Oblast, the Interregional Cluster for Nuclear Power Engineering, and subcontracting projects between the Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Arkhangelsk and Yaroslavl Oblasts. The empirical base includes official documents, analytical reports, expert assessments, and open-source materials. The results identify three key models of interregional cooperation: institutional, coordination, and network-based. The findings demonstrate that the most sustainable outcomes emerge from hybrid configurations combining vertical support (federal, institutional recognition, regulatory backing) with horizontal interaction (regional collaboration, business participation, and knowledge exchange). Key success factors include political commitment of regional leadership, reliance on established economic specialization, active involvement of private sector actors, the presence of dedicated project management structures, diversified financing mechanisms, and a results-oriented project approach. The scientific novelty lies in the systematization of governance models of regional cooperation and the empirical identification of success factors within the Russian spatial development context. The practical significance lies in the applicability of these findings for designing interregional initiatives and improving public policy instruments. The study concludes that interregional cooperation is an effective mechanism for reducing spatial differentiation when supported by institutional formalization, diversified, and coordinated stakeholder engagement. The greatest potential is observed in sectors critical to technological sovereignty, including the fuel and energy complex, nuclear power engineering, science and education. The study is limited by its focus on successful cases. Future research should examine unsuccessful projects, assess long-term impacts on regional inequality, develop quantitative evaluation tools, and explore the role of digital platforms in scaling cooperative models.

  • References

    1. Cooke P. (1992) Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geofo- rum, 23 (3), 365–382. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9

    2. Fritsch M. (2001) Co-operation in regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 35 (4), 297–307. DOI: 10.1080/00343400124434

    3. Cooke P. (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (4), 945–974. DOI: 10.1093/icc/10.4.945

    4. Cooke P. (2002) Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27 (1), 133–145. DOI: 10.1023/A:10131- 60923450

    5. Asheim B.T., Coenen L. (2006) Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising lear- ning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 163–173. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0

    6. Trippl M. (2010) Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101 (2), 150–160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 9663.2009.00522.x

    7. Belousov D.R., Apokin A.Iu., Sukhareva I.O., Frolov A.S. (2012) Dolgosrochnoe prognozirovanie sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo i nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiia Rossii: metodologiia [Long-term fore- casting of Russia's socio-economic and scientific-technological development: methodology], Moscow: MAKS Press.

    8. Karavaeva T.I., Komkova M.S., Burkov A.S., Klimanov V.V., Mikhailova A.A., IAgovkina V.A., Fedorov I.I. (2023) Ob"ediniaia vozmozhnosti. Mezhmunitsipal'nye i mezhregional'nye proekty v aglomeratsiiakh i ne tol'ko [Combining capabilities. Inter-municipal and inter-regional projects in agglomerations and beyond], Moscow: Fond “Tsentr strategicheskikh razrabotok” (TsSR).

    9. Kobzev V.V., Babkin A.V., Skorobogatov A.S. (2022) Digital transformation of industrial enter- prises in the new reality. π-Economy, 15 (5), 7–27. DOI: 10.18721/JE.15501

    10. Kuznetsova O.V. (2022) Development of municipal issues in the state spatial policy of Russia. Regional Research, 2, 16–24.

    11. Asheim B.T., Lawton Smith H., Oughton C. (2011) Regional innovation systems: Theory, em- pirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45 (7), 875–891. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.596701

    12. Rodríguez-Pose A. (2013) Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47 (7), 1034–1047. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978

    13. Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2012) The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52 (1), 134–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

    14. Zubarevich N.V. (2010) Regiony Rossii: neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiiam [Russia's Regions: Inequality, Crisis, Modernization. Moscow: Independent Institute for Social Policy], Moscow: Nezavisimyi institut sotsial'noi politiki.

    15. Zubarevich N.V. (2019) Spatial development Strategy: Priorities and instruments. Voprosy Eko- nomiki, 1, 135–145. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-1-135-145

    16. Boschma R. (2005) Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39 (1), 61–74. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887

    17. Boschma R., Iammarino S. (2009) Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85 (3), 289–311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x

    18. Boschma R., Minondo A., Navarro M. (2012) Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Pa- pers in Regional Science, 91 (2), 241–257. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00387.x

    19. Boschma R. (2017) Relatedness as a driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Re- gional Studies, 51 (3), 351–364. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767

    20. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87 (3), 237–265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x

    21. Balland P.-A., Boschma R. (2021) Complementary interregional linkages and smart specialisation: An empirical study on European regions. Regional Studies, 55 (6), 1059–1070. DOI: 10. 1080/00343404.2020.1861240

    22. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2015) Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49 (8), 1291–1302. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013. 799769

    23. Trippl M., Zukauskaite E., Healy A. (2020) Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies, 54 (10), 1328–1340. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763

    24. Makkonen T., Weidenfeld A., Williams A.M. (2017) Cross-Border Regional Innovation System Integration: An Analytical Framework. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108 (6), 805–820. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12223

    25. Derudder B., Liu X. (2025) Cross-border regional innovation systems: Concepts, approaches and perspectives. Regional Studies, 59 (1), art. no. 2418704. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2024.2418704

    26. Shaheen I., Brakman S., Canello J., Garretsen H. (2025) Globalisation in flux: Examining the role of inter-regional linkages in building regional resilience. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 12 (1), 943–962. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2025.2581470

    27. Pike A., Dawley S., Tomaney J. (2010) Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Jour- nal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3 (1), 59–70. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsq001

    28. Boschma R. (2015) Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49 (5), 733–751. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481

    29. Oshchepkov A., Lehmann H., Silvagni M.G. (2023) Regional convergence in Russia: Estimating an augmented Solow model. Economic Systems, 47 (4), art. no. 101128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101128

    30. Taymaz E. (2022) Regional convergence or polarization: The case of the Russian Federation. Regional Research of Russia, 12, 469–482. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522700198

    31. Zubarevich N.V., Safronov S.G. (2024) Interregional inequality in Russia and Post-Soviet coun- tries in the 21st century. Regional Research of Russia, 14, 513–524. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970524600537

    32. Fedorov L. (2002) Regional Inequality and Regional Polarization in Russia, 1990–99. World Development, 30 (3), 443–456. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00124-3

    33. Rodríguez-Pose A., Crescenzi R. (2008) Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42 (1), 51–67. DOI: 10. 1080/00343400701654186

    34. Balland P.-A., Rigby D. (2017). The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93 (1), 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947

    35. Deegan J., Broekel T., Haus-Reve S., Fitjar R.D. (2024) How regions diversify into new jobs: From related industries or related occupations? Regional Studies, 58 (11), 1965–1980. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2024.2335265

     

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article