State industrial policy and development institutions: elements of assessment of systemic interrelations

Regional and branch economy
Authors:
Abstract:

The relevance of this research topic is due to the importance of analyzing the systemic relations of state development institutions for assessing their effectiveness and identifying problems in implementing state industrial policy related to systemic relations and interactions. The objective of this study is to develop a methodological tool for assessing the systemic relations of the Industrial Development Fund (IDF) as a state institution for industrial development implementing state industrial policy. The research methods utilize system and economic analyses. A distinctive feature of the developed tool is its consideration of the nature of the IDF’s interactions with government bodies, other state development institutions, and industrial enterprises, as well as the influence of the external environment on these interactions, including macroeconomic conditions and the state and dynamics of the industrial complex. To assess the systemic interrelations of the IDF, the authors develop four groups of indicators characterizing: 1) the volume of financial support for industrial enterprises through the instruments of the IDF; 2) securing the IDF’s obligations and relationships with other state development institutions; 3) the state and dynamics of the manufacturing complex; 4) the influence of the external environment and macroeconomic conditions (indicators characterizing the dynamics of the Bank of Russia key rate) on these interactions. The study shows that for the period under review (from 2020 to 2024), the years with a significant increase in production and investment in fixed assets of manufacturing enterprises (2021, 2023, 2024) are characterized by an increase in the Bank of Russia key rate, as well as a decrease in the net provision of loans by the IDF to industrial enterprises (activities with targeted funds). An increase in the Bank of Russia key rate means an increase in the cost of commercial lending, including for industrial enterprises. The identified interrelations reflect the interaction of the mechanisms of state industrial and monetary policy. Changes are also occurring in the structure of the IDF’s loan repayment security for various forms: the share of collateral and surety is decreasing, the share of bank guarantees, which become the primary form of collateral at the end of the period under review, is increasing, and the share of other collateral is also increasing. The identified structural changes reflect changes in the intensity of the IDF’s interactions with other state development institutions and credit organizations. The scope of application of the obtained results includes state industrial policy and the activities of state industrial development institutions in supporting industrial enterprises.

  • References

    1. Mikhaylova A.A. (2025) Changing Government Approaches to Technological Development: Results of a Cross-Country Assessment of Security Strategies. Economy of regions, 21 (4), 977–998. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2025-4-5

    2. Arshinova A.I. (2025) Strategizing the development of education in the regions of Russia in the context of managing economic growth, digitalization and strengthening the technological sovereignty of industry. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 18 (1), 24–34. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-1-1431

    3. Pravdina N.V., Danilova I.V., Karpushkina A.V. (2025) Regional Industrial Specialization as a Driver of Russia’s Industrial Sovereignty. Economy of regions, 21 (4), 945–962. DOI: 10.17059/ekon. reg.2025-4-3

    4. Babkin A.V., Tashkinov A.G. (2025) A combined approach to project management of digital transformation of industrial enterprises in the context of Industry 4.0. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 18 (4), 472–485. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-4-1553

    5. Sborshchikov S.B., Mazur K.E., Ageev M.A. (2025) Impact of digitalization on the execution of integration processes in industrial companies. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 18 (2), 265–274. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-2-1437

    6. Mityakov E.S., Mityakov S.N. (2026) Methodical Approach to Efficiency Analysis of Sectoral Industrial Ecosystems. Economy of regions, 22 (1), 145–159. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2026-1-11

    7. Zhuravlev D.M., Chaadaev V.K., Mikheev E.B. (2025) Factors of labour productivity growth of the industrial sector in the context of the economic restructuring. Russian Journal of Industrial Econo- mics, 18 (1), 49–62. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-1-1425

    8. Kvint V.L., Vlasyuk L.I., Novikova I.V., Chkhotua I.Z. (2025) Assessment of human potential in the strategizing of industrial regions of Russia. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 18 (4), 459–471. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-4-1564

    9. Novikova I.V. (2025) Strategic features of formation of human resources potential of industry in scientific and technological development of Russia. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 18 (3), 325–332. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-3-1516

    10. Golikova V.V., Mukovnin S.K., Kazun A.P., Ershova N.V. (2025) Shortage of skilled workforce in manufacturing: A consequence of firms ineffectiveness or an obstacle for the growth of effective firms? Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2, 39–65. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-2-39-65

    11. Pankratov A.A., Musaev R.A., Badina S.V. (2025) Electronic industry of the Russian Federation: trends, problems and strategizing its development. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 18 (2), 226–240. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-2-1470

    12. Podshivalova M.V., Vaisman E.D., Podshivalov D.V. (2025) Firm demography in Russian industry in the context of small business specifics: Is there a silver lining? Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2, 19–38. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-2-19-38

    13. Belitskaya A.V., Goryashin D.V., Yakovlev A.A. (2025) Rethinking industrial policy in the context of the social contract through the lens of economic theory. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 18 (3), 358–366. DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-3-1487

    14. Sheng F., Zhu L., Zhu S. (2026) Global Resurgence of Industrial Policy: Evidence from 2023 GTA-NIPO Data. Economy of regions, 22 (1), 59–72. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2026-1-5

    15. Simachev Yu.V., Fedyunina A.A. (2025) Priorities and instruments of modern industrial policy: Subsidies for economic complexity. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 8, 5–25. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-8-5-25

    16. Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G. (2020) State support of enterprises in Russia: Beneficiaries and effects. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 3, 63–83. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-63-83

    17. Palash S.V., Plyusnina O.V. (2023) Analysis of the current state of the monetary subsystem of state support for industry in the Russian Federation. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship], 12 (161), 1468–1475. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2023.161.12.285

    18. Finagin M.I., Inogamova V.Т., Gracheva A.A. (2025) Monetary conditions tightness indices for Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 9, 62–87. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2025-9-62-87

    19. Drobyshevsky S.M., Perevyshin Yu.N., Sinelnikov-Murylev S.G., Trunin P.V. (2025) Reasons for accelerating inflation in the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1, 5–31. DOI: 10.32609/0042- 8736-2025-1-5-31

    20. Lenchuk E.B. (2015) Financial institutions of development in the solution of the tasks of technological modernization and innovative development. Federalism, 4 (80), 7–24. DOI: 10.21686/2073- 1051-2015-4-7-24

    21. Chistyakova O.V., Babkin A.V. (2019) Business development institutes as tool of state support of small and medium-sized innovative entrepreneurship. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 12 (6), 128–138. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12611

    22. Sidorova E.N., Tatarkin D.A. (2016) The Role of the Development Institutions in the Public Investment Policy: Analysis of the Current State and Assessment of Performance. Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management, 15 (4), 506–528. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2016.15.4.026

    23. Tatarkin А.I., Kotlyarova S.N. (2013) Regional development institutions as an economic growth factors. Ekonomika regiona [Regional economy], 3, 9–18. DOI: 10.17059/2013-3-1

    24. Ivanov O.B., Bukhvald E.M. (2018) Regional'nye instituty razvitiia v sisteme strategicheskogo planirovaniia [Regional development institutions in the strategic planning system]. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice, 1, 61–77. DOI: 10.24411/2071-6435-2019-10004

    25. Mel'nikov R.M. (2012) Rezul'tativnost' i effektivnost' rossiiskikh finansovykh institutov razvitiia: podkhody k otsenke i puti povysheniia [The effectiveness and efficiency of Russian development finance institutions: approaches to assessment and ways to improve]. Finansy i kredit [Finance and credit], 21 (501), 2–10.

    26. Palash S.V. (2019) Evaluation of the effectiveness of the industrial development fund in the implementation of structural industrial policy. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo [Economics and Entrepreneurship], 6 (107), 266–274.

    27. Kleiner G. (2013) System Economics as a Platformfor development of modern Economic Theory. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 6, 4–28. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2013-6-4-28

    28. Kleiner G.B. (2023) Alexander Bogdanov’s system methodology from the perspective of the modern economic worldview. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 3, 24–39. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-3-24-39

    29. Kleiner G.B. (2024) The systems paradigm and the theory of technology. Terra Economicus, 22 (4), 6–18. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2024-22-4-6-18

    30. Gumerov M.F. (2026) System modeling in economics: evolution of approaches and development prospects. π-Economy, 19 (1), 203–216. DOI: 10.18721/JE.19110

    31. Palash S.V., Palash M.S. (2025) State industrial development institutions in the system of state industrial policy. Finansovye rynki i banki [Financial markets and banks], 12, 726–729.

     

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article