Assessment of the economic effects of structural changes in the manufacturing industry of Russia

Regional and branch economy
Authors:
Abstract:

The article examines methodological issues of assessing the economic effects of structural changes in the manufacturing industry. The aim of the study is to assess the economic effects of structural changes in the manufacturing industry of the Russian Federation in 2020−2024, namely, to evaluate the contribution of the redistribution of average headcount of employees across technological groups of the manufacturing industry to the change in labor productivity. The methodological basis of the study is the works of S. Fabricant, B. Massell, M. Syrquin, M.P. Timmer and A. Szirmai, as well as studies on structural transformation and technological dynamics in industry. The scientific novelty lies in the modification of methods for analyzing structural changes in industry and adapting the shift-share approach to the assessment of the economic effects of structural changes in the average headcount of employees across technological groups of manufacturing industries. The author modifies the methodology of Timmer and Szirmai, in which the change in productivity is decomposed into the within-sector effect, the static structural effect, and the dynamic interaction effect. The difference of the modified methodology lies in applying this decomposition logic to the assessment of structural changes in the manufacturing industry, taking into account the grouping of its industries according to OECD technological groups. Another difference is the choice of time intervals for the calculation. In the Timmer and Szirmai study, labor productivity decomposition is carried out over large intervals, ranging from five to ten years depending on the country and period. This article uses a chain annual calculation for 2020−2024 over the intervals 2020−2021, 2021−2022, 2022−2023, and 2023−2024. This allows tracking the change in the contribution of structural redistribution not only over the entire period, but also over individual years. The empirical base is formed from Rosstat data for 24 types of manufacturing activities, aggregated into four OECD technological groups. It is shown that the structure of the average headcount of employees by technological group changed moderately in 2020−2024. The share of high-technology industries increased, while the share of low-technology industries decreased. The structure of the volume of shipped goods differs significantly from the employment structure: the largest share of shipment volume is accounted for by medium-low- technology industries. Labor productivity, measured as the volume of shipped goods per employee, increased across all technological groups. It was established that the increase in labor productivity was mainly driven by the within-sector effect calculated at the level of technological groups. The static structural effect at the level of technological groups was positive but significantly smaller than the within-sector component, while the dynamic interaction effect was minimal.

  • References

    1. Timmer M.P., Szirmai A. (2000) Productivity Growth in Asian Manufacturing: The Structural Bonus Hypothesis Examined. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11 (4), 371–392. DOI: 10.1016/ S0954-349X(00)00023-0

    2. Voskoboynikov I., Gimpelson V. (2015) Productivity Growth, Structural Change and Informality: The Case of Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 11, 30–61. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-30-61

    3. Kazinets L.S. (1969) Izmerenie strukturnykh sdvigov v ekonomike [Measuring structural shifts in the economy], Moscow: Ekonomika.

    4. Sukharev O.S. (2020) Strukturnaia i tekhnologicheskaia dinamika rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Structural and technological dynamics of the Russian economy], Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.

    5. Kotov A.V. (2021) Spatial Shift-Share Analysis as a Tool for Studying the Economic Development of Russia’s Macroregions. Economy of Region, 17 (3), 755–768. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-3

    6. Ovchinnikova A.V., Bogachev E.A. (2024) Industrial Structural Changes in the Economy of the Udmurt Republic. Economy of Regions, 20 (1), 189–204. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-13

    7. Serova N.A., Skufyna T.P. (2023) Analyzing the Structural Development of Industrial Production in the Regions of the Russian Arctic. The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, 1, 108–119. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.1.2023.79.007

    8. Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A., Faleychik L.M. (2025) Transformation of the Manufacturing Industry Structure in the East of Russia during a Period of Economic Shocks. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 18 (12), 2461–2477.

    9. Palash S.V. (2018) Analysis of the structural dynamics in the manufacturing industry at the natio- nal and regional levels. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 11 (1), 64–76. DOI: 10.18721/JE.11106

    10. Palash S.V. (2019) Modeling the economic effects of import substitution in russian manufacturing industry. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 12 (1), 59–69. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12105

    11. Simachev Iu.V., Fediunina A.A., Kuzyk M.G. (2022) Novye kontury promyshlennoi politiki. Doklad NIU VSHE [New Contours of Industrial Policy. HSE Report.]. XXIII Iasinskaia (Aprel'skaia) mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsiia po problemam razvitiia ekonomiki i obshchestva [Proceeding of the 23rd Yasinskaya (April) International Scientific Conference on Problems of Economic and Social Development], 1–75. [online] Available at: https://indpolicy.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/863520529.pdf?ysclid= mra9t5hb6y359166189 [Accessed 07.07.2026]

    12. Syrquin M. (1988) Chapter 7. Patterns of Structural Change. In: Handbook of Development Economics (eds. H. Chenery, T.N. Srinivasan), 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 203–273. DOI: 10.1016/S1573-4471 (88)01010-1

    13. Herrendorf B., Rogerson R., Valentinyi Á. (2014) Chapter 6. Growth and Structural Transformation. In: Handbook of Economic Growth (eds. P. Aghion, S.N. Durlauf), 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 855–941. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00006-9

    14. Duarte M., Restuccia D. (2010) The Role of the Structural Transformation in Aggregate Productivity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (1), 129–173.

    15. Acemoglu D., Guerrieri V. (2008) Capital Deepening and Nonbalanced Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 116 (3), 467–498. DOI: 10.1086/589523

    16. Duernecker G., Sanchez-Martinez M. (2023) Structural Change and Productivity Growth in Europe – Past, Present and Future. European Economic Review, 151, art. no. 104329. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104329

    17. Comin D., Lashkari D., Mestieri M. (2021) Structural Change with Long-Run Income and Price Effects. Econometrica, 89 (1), 311–374. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA16317

    18. Fabricant S. (1942) Employment in Manufacturing, 1899–1939: An Analysis of Its Relation to the Volume of Production, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    19. Massell B.F. (1961) A Disaggregated View of Technical Change. Journal of Political Economy, 69 (6), 547–557. DOI: 10.1086/258575

    20. Syrquin M. (1984) Resource Allocation and Productivity Growth. In: Economic Structure and Performance: Essays in Honor of Hollis B. Chenery (eds. M. Syrquin, L. Taylor, L.E. Westphal), Orlando: Academic Press, 75–101.

    21. Mensah E., Owusu S., Foster-McGregor N., Szirmai A. (2023) Structural Change, Productivity Growth and Labour Market Turbulence in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 32 (3), 175–208. DOI: 10.1093/jae/ejac010

    22. Konte M., Kouamé W.A., Mensah E.B. (2022) Structural Reforms and Labor Productivity Growth in Developing Countries: Intra or Inter-Reallocation Channel? The World Bank Economic Re- view, 36 (3), 646–669. DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhac002

    23. Djidonou G.R., Foster-McGregor N. (2022) Stagnant Manufacturing Growth in India: The Role of the Informal Economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 63, 528–543. DOI: 10.1016/j. strueco.2022.07.007

    24. Kruse H., Mensah E., Sen K., de Vries G. (2023) A Manufacturing (Re)Naissance? Industrialization in the Developing World. IMF Economic Review, 71 (2), 439–473. DOI: 10.1057/s41308-022- 00183-7

    25. Erumban A.A., de Vries G.J. (2024) Structural Change and Poverty Reduction in Developing Economies. World Development, 181, art. no. 106674. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106674

    26. Hamilton C., de Vries G.J. (2025) The Structural Transformation of Transition Economies. World Development, 191, art. no. 106977. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106977

    27. Kuosmanen T., Kuosmanen N. (2021) Structural Change Decomposition of Productivity without Share Weights. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 120–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.011

    28. Galindo-Rueda F., Verger F. (2016) OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Art. no. 2016/04. DOI: 10.1787/ 5jlv73sqqp8r-en

    29. Pavitt K. (1984) Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, 13 (6), 343–373. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0

    30. OECD (2023) Decomposition of Aggregate Labour Productivity Growth into Industry Contributions – Methodology Applied in the OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2023. [online] Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/support-materials/2023/02/oecd-compendium-of-productivity-indicators-2023_bdbeba7d/oecd-compendium-of-productivity-indicators-2023-methodology.pdf [Accessed 07.07.2026]

    31. OECD (2025) OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2025, Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/b024d9e1-en

     

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article