The ESG concept in the sustainable development agenda: features and key research vectors

Economy and management of enterprise and complexes
Authors:
Abstract:

Unprecedented sanctions pressure, the transformation of global market structures, and the need to implement technological sovereignty strategies necessitate a rethinking of current ESG approaches in the context of sustainable development. Despite the dynamic development of the ESG agenda at the global and national levels, the scientific community still lacks a unified position on the essence of the concept and an agreed-upon methodology for its implementation, which underlies the high scientific and practical significance of this study. The aim of this study is to systematize the key trends and challenges of the sustainable development agenda, identify the prerequisites for the formation and analysis of the ESG concept, and identify promising areas for research. The study utilized methods of systemic analysis and synthesis of scientific literature, content analysis of regulatory and strategic documents, a comparative analysis of global and national ESG initiatives, and a synthesis of academic and applied research on sustainable development. The prerequisites for the development of the ESG concept are systematized, and the evolution of its understanding is traced — from investment philosophy to strategic management imperative. It is revealed that the current status of ESG research is characterized by fragmentation and immaturity of both the basic concept and individual areas of its development: ESG rating methodology, ESG data disclosure standards, and ESG investment performance assessment. A multi-level system of factors determining interest in the ESG agenda in Russia is established, including the formation of a national ESG infrastructure and deeper integration within the EAEU, SCO, and BRICS. The results can be used by researchers, regulators, and corporate practitioners in developing local ESG strategies, rating methodology, and ESG information disclosure standards. The scientific community lacks a unified position on either the essence of the ESG concept or individual areas of its development, which is explained by the «immaturity» of its fundamental basis. Directions for further research include refining the ESG categorization framework, improving the methodology for rating and assessing the effectiveness of ESG investments, and developing local ESG approaches, standards, and practices taking into account national specifics.

Funding:

The research was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project “Strategic Management of Intellectual Maturity of Industrial Ecosystems in the Data Economy: Methodology, Framework, and Tools” (Agreement No. 25-18-00978; available online: https://rscf.ru/project/25-18-00978/).

  • References

    1. Bobylev S. (2017) Sustainable Development: Paradigm for the Future. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 61 (3), 107–113. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-107-113

    2. Ursul A., Ursul T. (2017) Vectors of Achieving Sustainable Future. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 7, 139–149.

    3. Timofeev R.A., Timaev R.A., Yachmenev E.F. (2019) On the genesis of the concept of sustainable development. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, 4, 61–66.

    4. Sukhareva M.A., Lenkov I.N., Fokin N.S. (2023) From the concept of sustainable development to ESG and BCG concepts in public administration: a critical analysis of the conceptual and terminological field. Lomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21, 20 (2), 46–67. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2073- 2643-21-2023-2-46-67

    5. Anisimov A.P., Volkov I.K. (2023) The Concept of China's Ecological Civilization: Is it of Interest to Russian Environmental Law? NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 48 (3), 540–549. DOI: 10.52575/2712-746X-2023-48-3-540–54

    6. Belobragin V.IA., Salimova T.A., Soldatova E.V. (2023) ESG i tseli ustoichivogo razvitiia: parallel'nye miry ili edinaia vselennaia? [ESG and Sustainable Development Goals: Parallel Worlds or a Single Universe?] Standards and Quality, 9, 78–86. DOI: 10.35400/0038-9692-2023-9-206-23

    7. Razov P.V. (2022) ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects. Sociopolitical Sciences, 12 (2), 60–66. DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2022-12-2-60-66

    8. Morrison R. (2021) Environmental, Social, and Governance Theory: Defusing a Major Threat to Shareholder Rights. Profiles in Capitalism, 6, 1–108. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3845709

    9. Dovbiy I.P., Kobylyakova V.V., Minkin A.A. (2022) ESG transition as a new paradigm of global economy and sustainable financing. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Economics and Ma- nagement, 16 (1), 77–86. DOI: 10.14529/em220107

    10. Mayorova E.I., Temnova E.V. (2020) Concept of sustainable development: regulatory aspect. Management, 8 (4), 94–100. DOI: 10.26425/2309-3633-2020-8-4-94-100

    11. Fokina O.M., Serebriakova E.A. (2015) Ekologicheskie, sotsial'nye i korporativno-upravlencheskie faktory v sisteme printsipov OON po otvetstvennomu investirovaniiu [Environmental, social and governance factors in the UN Principles for Responsible Investment]. FES: Finansy. Ekonomika, Strategiia. Seriia: Innovatsionnaia ekonomika: chelovecheskoe izmerenie [FES: Finance. Economics, Strategy. Series: Innovative Economy: The Human Dimension], 6, 25–27.

    12. Babkin A.V., Malevskaia-Malevich E.D. (2021) Impact of socially responsible investment on the value of innovatively active industrial enterprises. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 14 (4), 82–94. DOI: 10.18721/JE.14406

    13. Vederin I.V., Golovshchinskii K.I., Davydov M.I., Pet'ko B.B., Sabirova M.S., Terskov S.V., Shishkin E.A. (2022) ESG: tri bukvy, kotorye meniaiut mir [ESG: Three Letters That Change the World]. XXIII Iasinskaia (Aprel'skaia) mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsiia po problemam razvitiia ekonomiki i obshchestva [Proceedings of the 23rd Yasinskaya (April) International Scientific Conference on Problems of Economic and Social Development], 1–137.

    14. Dovbiy I.P. (2022) Financial and Economic Conditions of the Energy Transition for the National Economy. Financial Journal, 14 (5), 25–42. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2022-5-25-42

    15. Kabir L.S., Sigova M.V., IAkovlev I.A. et al. (2021) ESG-transformatsiia finansovogo sektora v ekonomicheskoi real'nosti XXI veka [ESG Transformation of the Financial Sector in the Economic Reality of the 21st Century], monograph, Moscow, St. Petersburg: Izd-vo MBI.

    16. Mikhailov P.A., Babkin A.V., Melnik A.V., Trapeznikova A.M. (2025) Sustainable development as an important success factor for an industrial ecosystem in a data economy. Natural-Humanitarian Stu- dies, 3 (59), 363–367.

    17. Babkin A.V., Salimova T.A., Soldatova E.V. (2023) ESG-ratings: development trends, international and national practices. π-Economy, 16 (6), 77–92. DOI: 10.18721/JE.16606

    18. Verezubova T.A., Filipchenko N.M. (2022) Vozmozhnosti vnedreniia ESG-standartov v praktiku deiatel'nosti strakhovykh organizatsii [Opportunities for implementing ESG standards in the practices of insurance organizations]. Novaia ekonomika [New Economy], S2, 31–36

    19. Chuprov S.V., Babkin A.V. (2024) Nonlinear phenomena and stability of functioning of the industrial system in a digitalized economy. Models, systems, networks in economics, technology, nature and society, 3 (51), 71–85. DOI: 10.21685/2227-8486-2024-3-6

    20. Yashalova N.N., Potravny I.M. (2023) Possibilities of applying ESG-principles and methods of climate financing in the management practice of ferrous metallurgy enterprises. Chernye Metally, 5, 76–81. DOI: 10.17580/chm.2023.05.12

    21. Sassen R., Hinze A.-K., Hardeck I. (2016) Impact of ESG Factors on Firm Risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86, 867–904. DOI: 10.1007/s11573-016-0819-3

    22. Manyushis A., Bobylev S.N., Kavtaradze D.N., Tsedilin A.N. (2022) Sustainable development ecosystem: global challenge and strategic trend of the XXI century. Scientific Works of the Free Econo- mic Society of Russia, 235 (3), 315–336. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2022-235-3-315-336

    23. Lélé S.M. (1991) Sustainable Development: A Critical Review. World Development, 19 (6), 607–621. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P

    24. Trusina I., Jermolajeva E. (2021) The scientific discourse on the concept of sustainable development. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 12 (2), 298–322. DOI: 10.47743/ejes-2021-0215

    25. Friede G., Busch T., Bassen A. (2015) ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5 (4), 210–233. DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

     

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article