Success factors and scaling constraints of institutional innovations

Innovations management
Authors:
Abstract:

Countries are diversifying their payments, and this is a global trend. This article examines (as an institutional innovation project) a unique mechanism that enables participants in foreign economic activity to make payments in their national currencies — Sistema de Pagos en Monedas Locales (SML) — in South American countries. Unlike technological innovations (blockchain, smart contracts), the SML institutional innovation focuses on restructuring the rules of interaction between economic agents, reducing transaction costs, and creating an alternative institutional environment for foreign trade operations. The aim of the study is to identify success factors, assess the contribution to business competitiveness, and the limitations of scaling this institutional innovation project using the example of cross-border SML. This approach aims to formulate universal lessons and develop a methodology for creating similar systems. Based on an analysis of the system’s evolution (2008−2026), its operational mechanism, and statistical data, it was established that the SML reduces transaction costs for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by 15−20%, performs a countercyclical function during periods of currency crises, and serves as an alternative channel for imports in conditions of dollar liquidity shortages. However, the system’s scalability is constrained by a number of limitations: the lack of mechanisms for hedging currency risks and lending, the lack of operational continuity (the system does not function on holidays and weekends), the persistence of structural asymmetries (more than 99% of transactions are accounted for by Brazilian exports to Argentina), and the final dollar clearing between central banks. The following success factors have been systematized: voluntary participation, focus on SMEs as «early adopters», a simple and understandable settlement cycle (D+0, D+1, D+2), and institutional support from central banks and governments. A roadmap for the creation and scaling of institutional innovation projects has been developed, comprising four stages (inception, development, maturity, and expansion) across four areas (financial mechanism, technological platform, institutions and law, clients and adoption). The results are applicable to the design of similar systems, for example, within the EAEU or BRICS.

  • References

    1. Gundyrina T.O. (2011) Institutional innovations as the form of institutional changes. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio- Economic University], 4 (38), 9–14.

    2. Kolotyrin D.A. (2012) Institutional innovations as a result of institutional changes. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio- Economic University], 3 (1 (67)), 281–283.

    3. Raffaelli R., Glynn M.A. (2015) Institutional Innovation: Novel, Useful, and Legitimate. In: The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (eds. C.E. Shalley, M.A. Hitt, J. Zhou), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 407–420. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927678.013.0019

    4. AlMalki H.A., Durugbo C.M. (2023) Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model. Management Review Quarterly, 73 (2), 731–785. DOI: 10.1007/ s11301-022-00259-8

    5. Hancock D., Humphrey D.B. (1997) Payment transactions, instruments, and systems: A survey. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21 (11–12), 1573–1624. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00046-0

    6. Kahn C.M., Roberds W. (2009) Why pay? An introduction to payments economics. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 18 (1), 1–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2008.09.001

    7. Bech M., Hancock J. (2020) Innovations in payments. In: BIS Quarterly Review (eds. C. Borio, S. Claessens, B. Mojon, H.S. Shin, Ph. Wooldridge), Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 21–36.

    8. Bolt W., van Oordt M. (2020) On the Value of Virtual Currencies. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52 (4), 835–862. DOI: 10.1111/jmcb.12619

    9. Ricci L.A., Ahokpossi C., Quayyum S.N., Turk R.A., Belianska A., Cangul M., Fuje H., Lee S., Li G.B., Li X., Mu Y., Mwase N., Ree J.J., Shi H., Kramarenko V. (2025) Digital Payment Innovations in Sub-Saharan Africa. Departamental Papers, 2025 (004). DOI: 10.5089/9798400232220.087

    10. Kaltenbrunner A., Orsi B. (2025) Chapter 17 – Regional Payment Systems and Monetary Hierar- chy. In: The Cambridge Global Handbook of Financial Infrastructure (eds. C. Westermeier, M. Campbell- Verduyn, B. Brandl), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 209–233. DOI: 10.1017/97810094281- 18.020

    11. Asian Development Bank (2022) Collective Investment Scheme Transactions in ASEAN+3: Benchmark Product and Market Infrastructure Design, Manila: Asian Development Bank. DOI: 10.22617/ TCS220374-2

    12. African Export-Import Bank (2023) Trade and Market Update: Payment and Settlement Systems and Intra-African Trade. [online] Available at: https://research.knowledge.afreximbank.com/do/ 10.5555/c39c9a52dbbe38e2987f4a35b6b49b125d6cae66aab407a0312ea4e7e67d4e25/full/media/ trade-and-market-update-2023-payment-and-settlement-systems-and-intra-african-trade.pdf [Accessed 28.08.2026]

    13. Schachtschneider J. (2022) CIPS – China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System and Its Ro- le Within the RMB Internationalization Process. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4096107

    14. AfricaNenda foundation, ECA, World Bank Group (2024) The state of inclusive instant payment systems in Africa. [online] Available at: https://africanenda.org/wp-content/uploads/siips_2024_mainreport_EN.1.pdf [Accessed 28.08.2026]

    15. Buterin V. (2014) Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform (Ethereum White Paper). [online] Available at: https://courses.cs.duke.edu/spring23/compsci512/ papers/ethereum.pdf [Accessed 21.02.2026]

    16. Schär F. (2021) Decentralized Finance: On Blockchain- and Smart Contract-Based Financial Markets. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 103 (2), 153–174. DOI: 10.20955/r.103.153-74

    17. Gudgeon L., Perez D., Harz D., Livshits B., Gervais A. (2020) The Decentralized Financial Crisis: Attacking DeFi. arXiv:2002.08099v2, 1–20. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2002.08099

    18. Aramonte S., Huang W., Schrimpf A. (2021) DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion. In: BIS Quarterly Review (eds. C. Borio, S. Claessens, B. Mojon, H.S. Shin, N. Tarashev), Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 21–36.

    19. Pshenichnikov V.V. (2020) Prospects of issuing digital ruble and its functioning in the country’s payment turnover. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 13 (6), 101–109. DOI: 10.18721/JE.13609

    20. Dyudikova E.I. (2020) Models for integrating digital technologies into the international payment space. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 13 (3), 187–200. DOI: 1018721/ JE.13314

    21. Kudryavtseva T., Berawi M.A., Campos Devezas T., Barykin S.E. (2024) Understanding the Digital Transformation of Socio-Economic-Technological Systems, Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-56677-6

     

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article