<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
  <titleid/>
  <issn>2782-6015</issn>
  <journalInfo lang="ENG">
    <title>π-Economy</title>
  </journalInfo>
  <issue>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <number>5</number>
    <altNumber> </altNumber>
    <dateUni>2024</dateUni>
    <pages>1-150</pages>
    <articles>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>9-31</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Fomin</surname>
              <initials>Semyon</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Ermakova</surname>
              <initials>Zhanna</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Digitalization of the planning system at mechanical engineering enterprises: results, problems, prospects</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article considers the issues of digitalization of the end-to-end planning system of economic forms of enterprise associations (holdings, corporations, clusters), when many enterprises at all planning levels should work in one technical and methodological planning system. The purpose of this study is to substantiate the digitalization of the end-to-end planning system in the machine-building holding, including enterprises of single and small-scale production type. Based on a review of domestic and foreign studies in the field of planning from the 1920s to the present day, the following stages of informatization of the planning process are considered: the use of mechanical engineering tools, computerization, digitalization; the relevance of the transition of the planning system of machine-building holding to the stage of digitalization based on certain effects; the problems of digitalization; the inevitability of changes and the need to give these changes a positive content of modernization. From the point of view of digitalization, the elements of the planning system and their interrelations are identified: data, indicator, process, competence, tools. To ensure the creation of an end-to-end planning system, four stages of the cyclic process of changing (modernizing) the planning system in the digital environment are proposed: measurement (1) and evaluation (2) of the planning system performance, design (3) and implementation (4) of the planning system modification. The stages are considered in relation to the holding's enterprise (or enterprises) and to the planning system element. Changing the planning system element within the stage of changing the planning system itself is also considered as a cyclic process consisting of four stages. The results of the study were tested on two machine-building holdings. As a result of testing, it was largely possible to implement the proposed recommendations and achieve the declared effects of digitalization of the end-to-end planning system in the machine-building holding. At the same time, problems limiting the full achievement of the goals were identified. The problems of interfunctional interaction regarding planning in the digital environment determined the directions of further research. The study is useful for managers and specialists of machine-building holdings in the functions of planning, production, development, information technology (IT); as well as employees of IT and consulting companies that develop and implement planning systems in the digital environment.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>338.984</doi>
          <udk>10.18721/JE.17501</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>planning</keyword>
            <keyword>digitalization</keyword>
            <keyword>production</keyword>
            <keyword>holding</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.1/</furl>
          <file>01_Fomin%2C-Ermakova.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>32-44</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Rodionova</surname>
              <initials>Valentina</initials>
              <email>rodionovavn2011j@yandex.ru</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Antonov</surname>
              <initials>Ilya</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Multi-criteria analysis and digital solutions to improve the competitiveness of enterprises in the context of Industry 5.0</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In the context of increasing digital transformation and the transition to Industry 5.0, which represents a qualitatively new phase of industrialization, traditional approaches to ensuring the competitiveness of enterprises are losing their relevance. Industry 5.0 is characterized by a deep integration of human-machine interaction, customized production processes and increased attention to the principles of sustainable development, which requires a revision of the methods of strategic management of enterprises. The purpose of the study is to justify the application of multi-criteria analysis for the development of management decisions adapted to the conditions of Industry 5.0, aimed at ensuring the sustainable competitiveness of industrial enterprises. The methodology of the work is based on a systematic approach that includes analysis, synthesis, systematization, deduction and the hierarchy analysis method to form criteria and alternatives for hierarchical solutions, as well as to determine the vectors of their attractiveness. As a result of the research, a methodological design is proposed that allows taking into account the dynamic changes in the external environment and forming strategically verified decisions. The main results of the study are as follows: 1) the principle of forming criteria and alternatives to the hierarchy of decisions was developed to improve the level of sustainable competitiveness of enterprises in the context of Industry 5.0; the key criteria include the speed of digital transformation, innovation, efficiency of the resource base and resistance to environmental challenges; 2) the vectors of attractiveness of the formed alternatives were determined, among which financial and economic decisions turned out to be the most significant for strengthening sustainable competitiveness, and organizational, marketing and production digital decisions were identified as auxiliary, but important directions. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the development of a multi-criteria analysis system adapted to the challenges of Industry 5.0, which allows enterprises to form flexible and personalized strategies to improve competitiveness. The practical significance of the work consists in proposing tools for strategic management of enterprises, which helps to minimize the destructive impact of digital changes and strengthen competitive positions in the context of a new industrial paradigm. Future research directions include the study of methods for optimizing decisions to improve the flexibility of management processes in the Industry 5.0.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17502</doi>
          <udk>338</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>sustainable competitiveness of the enterprise</keyword>
            <keyword>digital transformation</keyword>
            <keyword>Industry 5.0</keyword>
            <keyword>hierarchy analysis method</keyword>
            <keyword>multi-criteria analysis</keyword>
            <keyword>challenge</keyword>
            <keyword>decisions</keyword>
            <keyword>priority</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.2/</furl>
          <file>02_Rodionova%2CAntonov.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>45-60</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Danilov</surname>
              <initials>Dmitriy</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Danilov</surname>
              <initials>Aleksandr</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Development of the market for industrial medical products in the context of digitalization and Industry 5.0</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The purpose of the research is to study the features of the development of the market of industrial medical products in the context of digitalization and transition to Industry 5.0, as well as to analyze the impact of digital technologies on economic relations in this sector. The relevance of the work is due to the global processes of digital transformation and the need to adapt medical markets to new technological challenges, which is particularly important in the context of import substitution and the desire for technological sovereignty. The research methodology includes a mixed method of analysis, which combines quantitative and qualitative approaches. The authors used statistical data, analytical reports and materials covering current trends and dynamics in the global and Russian markets. Special attention is paid to analyzing the competitiveness of the Russian medtech market and the role of digital technologies in its development. The main results include: 1) characterization of the features of the global and Russian medtech markets in the conditions of digital transformation management and Industry 5.0; 2) identification of key trends, such as the active introduction of artificial intelligence, telemedicine and IoT, as well as their impact on the structure and dynamics of the market; 3) development of recommendations for managing the development of the medtech market, including the concepts of circular transformation and ecosystem approach; 4) proposal to use the Living Labs concept as an effective tool to accelerate the implementation of innovations. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the system analysis of the convergence of Industry 5.0 principles and digitalization in the medtech sector, as well as in the proposal of new approaches to market management, taking into account global and local challenges. The practical value of the paper lies in proposing recommendations for the strategic development of the medtech market in the context of the digital economy. The conclusions confirm that Industry 5.0 creates new opportunities for the development of the medtech sector, but also requires active actions in innovation management and cooperation between science and industry. Future research directions include in-depth analysis of the role of living labs and ecosystems in accelerating technovation in the medtech market.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17503</doi>
          <udk>338.1</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>market</keyword>
            <keyword>industrial medical products</keyword>
            <keyword>medtech</keyword>
            <keyword>digital transformation</keyword>
            <keyword>Industry 5.0</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.3/</furl>
          <file>03_Danilov%2C-Danilov.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>61-87</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <scopusid>7005476276</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-8228-3109</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Glukhov</surname>
              <initials>Vladimir</initials>
              <email>vicerector.me@spbstu.ru</email>
              <address>195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>V-1094-2019</researcherid>
              <scopusid>56968223000</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-0941-6358</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Babkin</surname>
              <initials>Alexander</initials>
              <email>babkin@spbstu.ru</email>
              <address>Russia, 195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Batukova</surname>
              <initials>Louisa</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="004">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>Q-4229-2017</researcherid>
              <scopusid>57195759467</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0003-3644-4239</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Voronezh State Technical University</orgName>
              <surname>Shkarupeta</surname>
              <initials>Elena</initials>
              <email>9056591561@mail.ru</email>
              <address>20 letiya Oktyabrya st., 84, Voronezh, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="005">
            <authorCodes>
              <scopusid>57222509570</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-1801-4326</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Tashkent state university of economics</orgName>
              <surname>Makhmudova</surname>
              <initials>Guljahon</initials>
              <email>guljaxon0038@gmail.com</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Theoretical provisions of programming of strategic development of industry in the conditions of the formation of Industry 5.0</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In the context of the ongoing transition to an integrated cyber-information society and the corresponding cyber-information mode of production, the global industry is overcoming a period of deep systemic transformations at the macro-, meso- and micro-levels. The organizational foundations of industry, its financial, investment and information support acquire fundamentally new meanings and forms, which have no analogues in history. Today, in different industries, special mesostructures – umbrella industrial EICSG ecosystems – are emerging and becoming increasingly influential. This is explained by the fact that these mesostructures, together with system-forming industries, are designed to ensure infrastructural and functional basis of Industry 5.0, which is the primary form of the newly emerging cyber-information mode of production. The most important organizational and managerial problem of industry at the present stage of historical evolution remains the unsolved problem of the transition from “manual” management of large industrial mesostructures to organizational programming. The latter is a special organizational mechanism, which removes or significantly alleviates the problem of subjectivity, inconsistency, untimeliness, inadequacy of management decisions in conditions of high organizational and scientific and technological complexity of management facilities, volatility and uncertainty of their external environment, a large number of stakeholders influencing the decision-making processes. Basically, organizational programming is a mechanism for coordinating the objective organizational and institutional dynamics of industry, predetermined by the impact of scientific and technological progress. Organizational programming is functionally focused on identifying and understanding the laws and models of objective development of the industrial sphere and coordinating the integrated mass of joint efforts and resources of society to achieve optimal evolutionary transformations of industry. Solving the problem of transferring the management of industrial mesostructures to the mechanisms of organizational programming is hindered by: at the conceptual level – the lack of well-developed theoretical and methodological foundations of organizational programming of strategic industrial development; at the scientific and practical level – methodological, informational and instrumental inconsistency of research by specialists of different profiles in terms of creating an organizational platform of strategic industrial development program. The article proposes scientific and methodological provisions that form the foundations of organizational programming of strategic industrial development, as well as contribute to the development of methodological, informational and instrumental coherence of research for specialists of different profiles.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17504</doi>
          <udk>330.322.012</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>indicative planning</keyword>
            <keyword>sustainable development</keyword>
            <keyword>organizational programming</keyword>
            <keyword>digital transformation</keyword>
            <keyword>industrial ecosystem</keyword>
            <keyword>Industry 5.0</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.4/</furl>
          <file>04_Gluhov%2C-Babkin%2C-Batukova%2C-Shkarupeta%2C-Mahmudova.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>88-98</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Trapeznikova</surname>
              <initials>Irina</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Trapeznikova</surname>
              <initials>Zhanna</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Analysis of territorial disproportions in the level of industrial digitalization in the regions of Russia, taking into account industry specifics</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The purpose of the article: To analyze territorial disproportions in the digitalization of industrial sector enterprises. Methodology of the article: The study is not based on an independent author's methodology. The authors' task was to rank the subjects of the Russian Federation by the level of digitalization of industrial sectors. Given the nature of statistical information, the regions are ranked in two areas – the use of artificial intelligence by regional enterprises and the volume of production technologies used by industrial sectors within the boundaries of the administrative unit. The basis for this study were the materials of the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation website, as well as the Federal State Statistics Service. Results of the study: 1. The difference in the use of artificial intelligence by regional enterprises and the volume of high-tech solutions used by industrial sectors within the boundaries of the administrative unit were analyzed;&#13;
2. The reasons for the “digital lag” of individual industries and regions were considered. Based on the results of the study, the authors made the following general conclusions. The introduction of advanced production technologies at industrial enterprises is uneven. This is due to the fact that small commercial enterprises cannot afford to invest significant funds in technological and information development, and for heavy industries, digitalization does not always significantly affect the improvement of business results, which demotivates owners. The problem of the availability of personnel with the appropriate digital competencies is relevant for all industries and production volumes. To reduce the digital gap and create unified end-to-end platform digital systems that combine industry business processes of industrial enterprises into value-added production chains, it is necessary to improve the system of state incentives and subsidies. Priorities should be shifted towards personnel training, support for small industries, as well as those industries that cannot independently finance the development of digital competencies, while being significant for the economic development of the country. Author's contribution: Monitoring of territorial differences in the level of industrial digitalization was carried out; proposals were put forward for the transformation of the system of state support for the digital development of industrial enterprises.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17505</doi>
          <udk>332</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>territorial disproportions in industrial digitalization</keyword>
            <keyword>digital transformation of the economy</keyword>
            <keyword>state support for the digital development of the industrial sector</keyword>
            <keyword>uneven digital development of participants in value-added production chains</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.5/</furl>
          <file>05_Trapeznikova%2C-Trapeznikova.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>99-114</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Korokoshko</surname>
              <initials>Yulia</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Digital transformation of regional enterprises: research, assessment, opportunities</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">In the context of highly dynamic changes caused by the transition to Industry 4.0 and the digital economy, Russian enterprises must have up-to-date information about their development potential and real opportunities in order to adapt to the current conditions in a timely manner. This problem is especially relevant for representatives of the regional business community, many of whom have not yet realized the scale and depth of the necessary transformations. They remain unprepared for the onset of the industrial revolution and digitalization of the economy, which, of course, serves as a prerequisite for potential threats and risks of uncompetitiveness and even loss of business. The adopted course of our country on the formation of technological sovereignty, import substitution and digitalization of all domestic sectors of the Russian economy actualizes the topic of the study. In this regard, it is important to timely and objectively assess the opportunities and threats of digital transformation of Russian enterprises and take appropriate adequate measures to ensure their stable and sustainable development. The purpose of the study is to assess the awareness, perception and readiness of regional enterprises for digital transformation, conducted on the basis of marketing research methods, comparative and expert analysis. The study allowed us to obtain the following results: to study theoretical provisions that reveal the essence and content of digitalization and digital transformation; to assess the perception and readiness of regional enterprises for digital transformation; to identify practical results of the implementation of digital capabilities of regional enterprises; to identify the most promising areas of application of the possibilities of digitalization of business processes in the work of domestic enterprises. The results of the study demonstrate the current situation typical for the subjects of the Russian Federation (on the example of the Republic of Mordovia) from the perspective of digitalization of regional business and can serve as an indicator of assessing the readiness of its real state for the necessary digitalization of business processes. The results obtained indicate the mandatory need to systematically study the dynamically changing level of readiness of regional enterprises to adapt to digitalization, as well as to identify the factors hindering the digital transformation of modern companies.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17506</doi>
          <udk>65.011.56</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>Industry 4.0</keyword>
            <keyword>digital economy</keyword>
            <keyword>digital transformation</keyword>
            <keyword>digitalization</keyword>
            <keyword>business processes</keyword>
            <keyword>information technology</keyword>
            <keyword>enterprise</keyword>
            <keyword>regional business</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.6/</furl>
          <file>06_Korokoshko.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>115-131</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Peryshkin</surname>
              <initials>Mikhail</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>Q-4229-2017</researcherid>
              <scopusid>57195759467</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0003-3644-4239</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Voronezh State Technical University</orgName>
              <surname>Shkarupeta</surname>
              <initials>Elena</initials>
              <email>9056591561@mail.ru</email>
              <address>20 letiya Oktyabrya st., 84, Voronezh, Russia</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Networked regional structures as drivers for the formation of an intelligent digital technopolis in Industry 5.0</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG">The article considers the contribution of regional development based on network structures to the formation of an intelligent digital technopolis in the conditions of digital transformation and Industry 5.0. The relevance of the study is due to the challenges of digital transformation, which requires the development of network structures to accelerate the innovation activity of regions in the conditions of Industry 5.0. The formation of intelligent digital technopolises is becoming a key tool for increasing technological sovereignty and sustainable development of the Russian economy. The aim of the research is to study the impact of intellectual and digital capital on the development of network structures in the regions of the Northwestern and Central Federal Districts and their significance for the formation of intelligent digital technopolises. The research methods include hierarchical cluster analysis, correlation and regression analysis based on panel data. The study covers the period from 2015 to 2021, and the data were taken from the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation. The results showed that network structures contribute to increased innovation activity in the regions, especially in the conditions of Industry 5.0. The impact of digital capital was most significant both in depressed regions with low innovation rates and in regions leading in innovative development. In depressed regions with low innovation rates, the key driver of the development of network structures was the training of employees in information and communication technologies, while in the leading regions, the inventive activity and qualification of employees played an important role. The novelty of the work lies in the identification of the relationship between the level of digitalization and the development of network structures, as well as in the formulation of the recommendations for strengthening their role as drivers of an intelligent digital technopolis. The results of the research are valuable for developing strategies for digital transformation and the development of innovative ecosystems in Russian regions. The findings emphasize the importance of investment in digital infrastructure and IT skills for regional development in the conditions of Industry 5.0. Further research is planned to expand the geography of the analysis and consider the interaction between educational institutions, business and government agencies to improve the efficiency of network structures.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17507</doi>
          <udk>338.1</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>region</keyword>
            <keyword>network structures</keyword>
            <keyword>technopolis</keyword>
            <keyword>digital transformation</keyword>
            <keyword>Industry 5.0</keyword>
            <keyword>economic security</keyword>
            <keyword>technological sovereignty</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.7/</furl>
          <file>07_Perishkin%2C-Shkarupeta.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>RAR</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>132-145</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Shcherbakov</surname>
              <initials>Vladimir</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="002">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Silkina</surname>
              <initials>Galina</initials>
              <email>galina.silkina@gmail.com</email>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
          <author num="003">
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <surname>Shevchenko</surname>
              <initials>Svetlana</initials>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Managing transformational changes to ensure the dynamics of logistics digital maturity</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG"> In modern conditions, managing digital transformational changes is becoming a natural trend in the management response to the accelerated pace of revolutionary changes in the economy during the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. It manifests itself most clearly in highly dynamic and innovatively active industries and areas of economic activity, which include logistics, which determines the goal of this study – to provide scientific and methodological support for the processes of digital transformation of logistics through change management in achieving its digital maturity. The goal is achieved by solving problems related to: study of change management models with the prospect of their adaptation to the tasks of managing digital transformational changes in logistics; development of an integrated approach to managing transformational changes with an assessment of the maturity of information technology transformations in the process of digital transformation of logistics; substantiation of proposals for the formation of metrics of digital and intellectual maturity of logistics in organizations. The choice of methods-approaches and methods-techniques of system analysis, model design, logic of justification of assessments and formation of evaluative judgments is subject to the content of the tasks to be solved. The study is carried out by analytical comparison of the main models used in change management and innovation management models, when distinguishing between the target guidelines of management for the implementation of innovations with the expectation of obtaining the expected effects and for the effective implementation of innovations with the achievement of real effects, respectively. The new scientific result of the research is the construction of a functional model for managing transformational changes in the relationship between general economic and special management functions with the allocated area of forming evaluative judgments regarding the quality of transformations, taking into account the maturity criterion. The applied maturity context of quality assessment is presented in the context of the innovative dynamics of the “digitalization – digital transformation” process, where the digital transformation of logistics is considered a consequence of digitalization and a prerequisite for the transition to intellectualization as the highest form of manifestation of digitalization in the context of modern information technology realities. Further development of the functional model is seen in ensuring its multidimensional structure, where, along with changing the object of transformation (digital development of logistics), a change in the subject (competency development of decision-makers on logistics transformation) and a change in the management of transformation processes are envisaged.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17508</doi>
          <udk>332.05</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>change management models</keyword>
            <keyword>intra-organizational model of innovation management</keyword>
            <keyword>transformational changes</keyword>
            <keyword>functional model of managing transformational changes in an organization</keyword>
            <keyword>digital transformation</keyword>
            <keyword>digital maturity of logistics</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.8/</furl>
          <file>08_Shcherbakov%2C-Silkina%2C-Shevchenko.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
      <article>
        <artType>BRV</artType>
        <langPubl>RUS</langPubl>
        <pages>146-150</pages>
        <authors>
          <author num="001">
            <authorCodes>
              <researcherid>V-1094-2019</researcherid>
              <scopusid>56968223000</scopusid>
              <orcid>0000-0002-0941-6358</orcid>
            </authorCodes>
            <individInfo lang="ENG">
              <orgName>Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University</orgName>
              <surname>Babkin</surname>
              <initials>Alexander</initials>
              <email>babkin@spbstu.ru</email>
              <address>Russia, 195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29</address>
            </individInfo>
          </author>
        </authors>
        <artTitles>
          <artTitle lang="ENG">Review of the monograph «Strategizing of the regional real estate market in the contingency period» by P.M. Petrova (Moscow, St. Petersburg, 2024)</artTitle>
        </artTitles>
        <abstracts>
          <abstract lang="ENG"> One of the most important goals of the process of strategizing the socio-economic development of national economy entities is to improve the quality of human life, which is assessed by various indicators, including the housing affordability indicator. This indicator is the most important indicator of the socio-economic well-being of the population of the country and its regions. In the conditions of changes in this indicator, the social environment in the region may change, which affects both the emotional state of the population and the material one. At the same time, changes in the sphere of residential real estate also affect the sustainability of the development of the entire regional economic system. The monograph by P.M. Petrova, submitted for review, is devoted to the study of these processes and the identification of strategic priorities for the development of the regional residential real estate market in the conditions of extraordinary market conditions.</abstract>
        </abstracts>
        <codes>
          <doi>10.18721/JE.17509</doi>
          <udk>330</udk>
        </codes>
        <keywords>
          <kwdGroup lang="ENG">
            <keyword>methodology of strategizing</keyword>
            <keyword>quality of human life</keyword>
            <keyword>regional residential real estate market</keyword>
            <keyword>strategic development priorities</keyword>
            <keyword>contingency period</keyword>
          </kwdGroup>
        </keywords>
        <files>
          <furl>https://economy.spbstu.ru/article/2024.109.9/</furl>
          <file>09_Babkin.pdf</file>
        </files>
      </article>
    </articles>
  </issue>
</journal>
