Managing an organization’s business processes based on a digital maturity assessment toolkit: a cluster-oriented approach

Digital economy: theory and practice
Authors:
Abstract:

The mere presence of information systems does not ensure higher manageability and productivity in organizations. Digital technologies become real tools for business process management only when they correspond to the current maturity level of the institution. The article presents a methodology for the cluster-based selection of innovative business process management tools in health care organizations based on the assessment of their digital maturity. The empirical basis consists of survey data from 390 medical workers. Using statistical analysis, a general factor of digital maturity was identified, which explains the evaluation of nine key business processes. Based on this general factor, a typology of six clusters was developed and grouped into three maturity zones: low, medium, and high. The low zone is characterized by a high share of routine operations, weak regulation, and the predominance of paper-based and manual practices. The medium zone reflects a transitional state. In this state, individual digital services are already used, but their connection with end-to-end pathways and management control remains insufficient. The high zone is associated with a more stable digital architecture, but may require further integration of data, standardization, and scaling of successful practices. The structure of digital transformation barriers changes qualitatively from resource constraints in low clusters to systemic integration problems in high clusters. On this basis, an integrated index of the digital maturity of a health care organization, a diagnostic scheme, and a rapid self-identification tool were developed. These elements make it possible to link the results of statistical typology with primary managerial diagnostics and to determine which tools should be applied in an organization based on its maturity level. Using the example of two health care organizations, the logic of targeted selection is demonstrated and the economic potential of reducing process losses is assessed. The calculations show that reducing routine workload can generate savings in working time, reduce errors, accelerate the patient pathway, decrease transaction losses, and increase the transparency of management control. The results indicate the need to align the choice of digital solutions with the maturity level of processes, the type of dominant barriers, and the organization’s readiness for the next stage of digitalization. This reduces the risk of implementing tools that exceed the organization’s actual digital capacity. The proposed methodology can be used for the typification of health care organizations and for targeted support of digitalization when implementing innovative business process management tools.

Funding:

The research was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of the state assignment “Conceptual ap-proaches to the formation of mechanisms of national economic sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the context of unprecedented global challenges” (No. 075-03-2026-489).

  • References

    1. Kovaleva I.P., Voblaya I.N., Zayarnaya I.A., Iritsyan G.E., Strizhak M.S. (2026) The actual trends in health care development. Problemi socialnoi gigieni, zdravookhranenia i istorii meditsini [Problems of social hygiene, public health and the history of medicine], 34 (1), 5–11. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2026- 34-1-5-11

    2. Perkhov V.I., Kaprin D.A. (2025) Organizational pathologies of hi-tech medical care. Part 1: diagnostics. ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VSHOUZ [HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT: News, Views, Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ], 11 (4), 102–115. DOI: 10.33029/2411-8621-2025-11-4-102-115

    3. Dumas M., La Rosa M., Mendling J., Reijers H.A. (2013) Fundamentals of Business Process Mana- gement, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5

    4. Hammer M., Champy J. (2009) Reengineering the Corporation: Manifesto for Business Revolution, NY: A. Zondervan.

    5. Stoumpos A.I., Kitsios F., Talias M.A. (2023) Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (4), art. no. 3407. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043407

    6. Rogers E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed., NY: Free Press.

    7. White R.S. (2001) Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. The Jour- nal of Technology Transfer, 26, 396–397. DOI: 10.1023/a:1011199223173

    8. Rosemann M., vom Brocke J. (2015) The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1 (eds. J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 105–122. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_5

    9. Van der Aalst W. (2016) Process mining: data science in action, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

    10. Hammer M. (2015) What is Business Process Management? In: Handbook on Business Process Ma- nagement 1 (eds. J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 3–16. DOI: 10.1007/978- 3-642-45100-3_1

    11. Object Management Group (2013) Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN): Version 2.0.2. [online] Available at: https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF [Accessed 18.08.2026]

    12. Santos A., Leal G.C.L., Balancieri R. (2025) Process mining in healthcare: a tertiary study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 25, art. no. 306. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02967-z

    13. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. (2008) The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    14. Gumerova G.I., Shaimieva E.Sh. (2019) Process integration in e-health system based on industry 4.0: developing of the business model for the russian practice (theoretical aspect). Medical doctor and information technologies, 2, 50–66.

    15. Iliashenko V.M., Iliashenko O.Yu (2020) Business intelligence systems as a medical organization data management tool. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniia v oblasti upravleniia, ekonomiki i tor- govli [Fundamental and applied research in management, economics and trade], 1, 333–338.

    16. Grigorieva N.S., Demkina A.E., Korobeynikova A.N. (2024) Digitalization in the Russian healthcare: barriers to digital maturity. Population and Economics, 8 (1), 1–14. DOI: 10.3897/popecon.8.e111793

    17. Morozova Yu.A. (2020) Digital transformation of Russian healthcare as a factor in the develop- ment of the industry. Intellect. Innovations. Investments, 2, 36–47. DOI: 10.25198/2077-7175-2020-2-36

    18. Zabolotnaya N., Gatilova I., Zabolotny A. (2020) Digitalization of health: achievements and prospects for development. Economics. Information Technologies, 47 (2), 380–389. DOI: 10.18413/2687-0932-2020-47-2-380-389

    19. Kalutskaya D.E., Nikolaenko E.G. (2025) Modern information technologies in healthcare management: key application problems and development prospects. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 3 (68), 817–822.

    20. Cai L., Zhu Y. (2015) The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, 14, art. no. 2. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2015-002

    21. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S., Ullman J.B. (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed., Boston, MA: Pearson, 481–498.

    22. Kozyrskii N., Chebotarev P., Balitskii G. (2018) Sravnenie iadernogo algoritma k-srednikh s metodom Uorda v zadachakh klasterizatsii vershin grafov [Comparison of the kernel k-means algorithm with Ward's method in graph node clustering problems]. Trudy Mezhdistsiplinarnoi shkoly-konferentsii “Informatsionnye tekhnologii i sistemy” [Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Conference-School “Information Technologies and Systems”] (ITiS 2018), 33–41.

    23. Dinh D.-T., Fujinami T., Huynh V.-N. (2019) Estimating the Optimal Number of Clusters in Ca- tegorical Data Clustering by Silhouette Coefficient. In: Knowledge and Systems Sciences (eds. J. Chen, V. Huynh, G.N. Nguyen, X. Tang), Singapore: Springer, 1103, 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1209-4_1

    24. Aldenderfer M., Blashfield R. (1984) Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    25. Liu X., Varshney U., Li P. (2026) Does it save me money? The economic impact of mobile health interventions on medical expenditure of diabetic patients. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 33 (2), 347–358. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf199

    26. Doherty A., Spencer L.H., Lynch M. (2025) Digital Platforms in Technology-Enhanced Care Management of Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review of the International Economic Evidence. International Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 8, art. no. 1681. DOI: 10.29011/2688-9501.101681

    27. Aviraj K.S., Mohanty M., Gnanasekaran S., Pachori R. (2024) Evaluating the Cost Utility and Budget Impact of Telehealth services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Preprint (Version 1). DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4999453/v1

    28. Gentili A., Failla G., Melnyk A., Puleo V., Di Tanna G.L., Ricciardi W., Cascini F. (2022) The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Pub- lic Health, 10, art. no. 787135. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.787135

    29. Peters G.M., Kooij L., Lenferink A., van Harten W.H., Doggen C.J.M. (2021) The Effect of Telehealth on Hospital Services Use: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23 (9), art. no. e25195. DOI: 10.2196/25195

    30. Romanov Е.V. (2020) Institutional Traps in the Scientific and Educational Sphere: Nature and Mechanism of Elimination. The Education and science journal, 22 (9), 107–147. DOI: 10.17853/1994- 5639-2020-9-107-147

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article