Innovative capacity of the Russia’s economy: The formation, level and intensity of usage

Innovations management
Authors:
Abstract:

The article assesses the impact of leveraging innovative capacity on the growth of the Russia’s economy. For this purpose, an economic construct of innovative capacity has been developed and its optimal level of usage has been determined. By defining the components of the innovative capacity of the economy based on the identified factors, its economic and mathematical model was built. Calculation of the effectiveness of using the innovative capacity of the Russia’s economy showed alignment between existing possibilities to newly emerging needs. Based on the contribution of the factors under study to GDP growth rate, the structure of the Russia’s economy was revealed. Taken together, this constitutes an approach in which innovative potential is comprised of such elements as innovative capabilities and innovative reserve. Achieving the targeted (planned) GDP growth rates is ensured by the optimal usage of the innovative capacity of the Russia’s economy, revealing the state of economic equilibrium. The developed criterion for the optimal usage of the innovative capacity shows a ratio between innovative capabilities and innovative reserve, which ensures the required growth rate of the final economic indicator. Determining the rate of using the innovative capacity, calculated as the ratio of innovative capabilities to innovative reserve, designates the point of ideal state of the economy. Exceeding this point indicates the intensity of its further usage. All of this substantiates the quality of the structure of the Russia’s economy. Taken together, this forms a methodology for assessing the impact of innovative capacity on the economic growth, which enables the identification of relevant research topics and, on this basis, determine promising directions for the implementation of their results. It also serves as a missing component in Russia’s modern economic strategy.

  • References

    1. Tukhtarova Ye.Kh. (2023) Perspektiva perekhoda Rossii na novyy tekhnologicheskiy uklad. Voprosy ekonomiki, 8, 147–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-8-147-158

    2. Martynov A.V. (2023) Struktura natsionalnoy ekonomiki Rossii: fenomen gibrida. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 10, 78–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S020736760028114-4

    3. Sukharev O.S. (2024) Tekhnologicheskiy suverenitet Rossii: formirovaniye na baze razvitiya sektora «ekonomika znaniy». Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 1, 47–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_47_64

    4. Battisti G., Stoneman P., Yuan Y. (2025) Measuring firm innovativeness across countries, sectors and time. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10 438599.2025.2484232

    5. Ayvazyan S.A., Afanasyev M.Yu., Rudenko V.A. (2014) Otsenka effektivnosti regionov RF na osnove modeli proizvodstvennogo potentsiala s kharakteristikami gotovnosti k innovatsiyam. Ekonomika i matematicheskiye metody, 50 (4), 34–70.

    6. Goryacheva T.V., Myzrova O.A., Goryacheva I.A. (2022) Issledovaniye faktorov formirovaniya innovatsionnogo potentsiala vertikalno-integrirovannykh kompaniy v makroregione. Ekonomika regiona, 18 (1), 265–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-19

    7. Malkina M.Yu. (2024) Promyshlennost rossiyskikh regionov v usloviyakh novykh antirossiyskikh sanktsiy. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika, 20 (3), 39–66. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.3.039-066

    8. Babkin A.V., Shkarupeta Ye.V. (2024) Industriya 6.0: sushchnost, tendentsii i strategicheskiye vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii. Ekonomika promyshlennosti, 17 (4), 353–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-4-1369

    9. Shirov A.A. (2024) Transformatsiya mirovoy ekonomiki: vozmozhnosti i riski dlya Rossii, M.: Dinamik Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47711/sr2-2024

    10. Afanasyev A.L., Golubev S.S., Kuritsyn A.V. (2025) Metodologicheskiye aspekty obosnovaniya programmnykh meropriyatiy po dolgosrochnomu razvitiyu promyshlennykh tekhnologiy. Ekonomika promyshlennosti, 18 (3), 367–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2025-3-1413

    11. Chen X., Wu X., Wang X. (2025) Prototype distinctiveness or exemplar distinctiveness? The effect of innovation categorisation position strategy on investor evaluation, Innovation, 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2025.2486845

    12. Altyner A., Bozkurt E., Topchuoglu O. (2022). Vliyaniye raskhodov na NIOKR na eksport vysokotekhnologichnoy produktsii. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, 15 (5), 153–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.8

    13. Kulibanova V.V., Pak Kh.S., Batsunov D.A. (2023) Razrabotka metodiki izmereniya urovnya innovatsionnogo razvitiya regiona. π-Economy, 16 (2), 75–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.16205

    14. Kirilchuk S.P., Morozova I.A. (2024) Forsayt innovatsionnykh protsessov v environike proizvodstvennykh sistem. π-Economy, 17 (1), 88–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.17106

    15. Smirnova O.O., Karlina Ye.P. (2024) Teoreticheskiye osnovy postroyeniya sistem upravleniya sovremennymi predpriyatiyami. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, 3, 22–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-5537-2024-3-22-32

    16. Ibragimova R.S., Golovkin D.S. (2025) Upravleniye ekonomicheskim potentsialom promyshlennogo predpriyatiya: sistema podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, 20 (3), 276–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2025-3-276-287

    17. Toroptsev Ye.L., Gudiyeva N.G. (2025) Vychislimyy dinamicheskiy mezhotraslevoy balans i yego primeneniye. Ekonomicheskaya politika, 20 (3), 116–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-3-116-139

    18. Kochetkov S.V., Kochetkova O.V. (2023) Ekonomicheskaya otsenka innovatsionnogo razvitiya: doktrina, metodologiya, prakseologiya. Chast I: O novom metode otsenki innovatsionnogo razvitiya ekonomiki. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, 21 (4), 26–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24147/1812-3988.2023.21(4).26-35

    19. Tsvetkov V.A., Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V. (2019) Analiticheskiye podkhody i metody otsenki ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona. Ekonomika regiona, 15 (1), 1–12. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.17059/2019-1-1

    20. Afanasyev A.A. (2025) Tekhnologicheskiy suverenitet: sushchnost, tseli i mekhanizm dostizheniya. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki, 15 (2), 469–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.15.2.122986

    21. Kasatkin D.M. (2025) Innovatsii kak osnovnoye preimushchestvo v konkurentsii krupnykh kompaniy. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plekhanova, 5, 111–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2025-5-111-117

    22. Melitz M.J. (2003) The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71 (6), 1695–1725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467

    23. Singler S. (2023) A Measurement Framework for Public Sector Innovation: Advancing the OSLO Manual for Public Sector. International Journal of Innovation Management, 27 (01n02), art. no. 2350005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919623500056

    24. Burkaltseva D.D. (2017) Tochki ekonomicheskogo i innovatsionnogo rosta: model organizatsii effektivnogo funktsionirovaniya regiona. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitiye), 8 (1 (29)), 8–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2017.8.1.8-30

    25. Yevseyev A.S., Kadyshev Ye.N., Urusova I.N. (2024) Logiko-strukturnaya model upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiyem ekonomiki regiona. Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravleniye, 4 (63), 28–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25686/2306-2800.2024.4.28

    26. Lapayev D.N. (2025) Sistema modeley mnogokriterialnogo i mnogoproyektsionnogo vybora v ekonomike. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravleniye, 16 (2), 21–31. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2025-16-2-21-31

    27. Markova V.D., Kuznetsova S.A. (2021) Ekosistemy kak innovatsionnyy instrument rosta biznesa. EKO, 51 (8), 151–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2021-8-151-168

    28. Topoleva T.N. (2024) Modelirovaniye tsifrovoy platformy innovatsionnoy proizvodstvennoy ekosistemy regiona. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 19 (4), 135–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2073-0462-2024-135-143

    29. Hussinger K., Palladini L. (2025) Do China’s special economic zones increase incentives to invest in R&D? Industry and Innovation, 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2025.2503283

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article