Methodological approach to developing of interregional network structures based on resource complementarity (the case of Northwestern and Central federal district regions)

Regional and branch economy
Authors:
Abstract:

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to improve the efficiency of using the industrial and scientific-technological potential of Russian regions in the context of limited resources and the need to ensure technological leadership. The high level of differentiation between regions in terms of socioeconomic development creates barriers to the development of innovative projects and the formation of sustainable economic growth. This requires the new regional development tools that enable regions to leverage their strengths. One such tool could be the formation of interregional network structures that activate resources within cooperation and facilitate the development of long-term value chains. The goal of the study is to develop methodological approaches to the formation of network structures between regions based on their resource complementarity. To achieve this goal, the efficiency of industrial portfolios of the Northwestern and Central federal districts was assessed using spatial shift-share analysis; cluster analysis to group regions by their functional specialization; network analysis to identify potential areas of interaction between regions based on data on the transfer of the results of intellectual activity (RIA) and the proximity of their industrial profiles. The study revealed that more than half of the regions in the Northwestern and Central federal districts are underutilizing their industrial potential. Even when specializing in growing industries, their performance lags behind regions with similar industrial portfolio structures. Most regions in the Northwestern and Central federal districts are characterized by a specialization in low-innovation activities, a low share of innovation expenditures in the total volume of shipped goods, works and services, and declining investment in fixed capital. A methodological approach has been developed to identify promising areas of cooperation between regions in the Northwestern and Central federal districts based on their functional specialization, structural and technological proximity and an analysis of existing RIA transfer flows. This approach allows for an assessment of both the current and potential levels of cooperation and provides a comprehensive assessment of the likelihood of developing effective network structures. Implementation of the proposed measures will bridge the gap between industrial potential and the actual level of interaction between regions, thereby contributing to the achievement of technological leadership. Future studies may include the service sector in the analysis, as well as develop new methods for the formation and development of network structures at the interregional level.

  • References

    1. Abdikeyev N.M., Bogachev Yu.S., Bekulova S.R. (2019) Investitsionnyy potentsial obrabatyvayushchey promyshlennosti. Finansy: teoriya i praktika, 23 (4), 24–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-4-24-42

    2. Averina L.M., Sirotin D.V. (2020) Otsenka prostranstvennykh effektov ot innovatsionnoy aktivnosti promyshlenno razvitykh regionov RF. Ekonomika regiona, 16 (1), 268–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-20

    3. Aslayeva S.Sh. (2024) Otsenka potentsiala mezhregionalnogo vzaimodeystviya. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo, 34 (6), 994–1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35-634/2412-9593-2024-34-6-994-1000

    4. Babkin A.V., Baykov Ye.A. (2018) Kollaboratsiya promyshlennykh i tvorcheskikh klasterov v ekonomike: sushchnost, formy, osobennosti. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskiye nauki, 11 (4), 141–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.11411

    5. Babkin A.V., Balog M.M., Gadzhiyev M.M. (2024) Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost v kontekste tsifrovizatsii: podkhody, tendentsii i ugrozy. Natsionalnyye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost, 6 (435), 1040–1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.20.6.1040

    6. Babkin A.V., Dolganova Ya.A. (2023) Faktory obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti depressivnykh regionov v usloviyakh tsifrovoy transformatsii. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitiye), 14 (3), 361–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.3.361-379

    7. Baburin V.L., Zemtsov S.P. (2017) Innovatsionnyy potentsial regionov Rossii, monografiya, M.: KDU, Universitetskaya kniga.

    8. Vazhenina I.S., Vazhenin S.G. (2020) Konkurentnoye sotrudnichestvo territoriy v sovremennom ekonomicheskom prostranstve. Ekonomika regiona, 16 (2), 406–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-2-6

    9. Gorochnaya V.V. (2021) Gorizontalnyye mezhregionalnyye svyazi v prigranichnom prostranstve yevropeyskoy chasti Rossii: sostoyaniye i perspektivy v period geoekonomicheskoy turbulentnosti. Ekonomika. Informatika, 48 (1), 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2021-48-1-5-16

    10. Granovetter M. (2002) Ekonomicheskoye deystviye i sotsialnaya struktura: problema ukorenennosti. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, 3 (3), 44–58.

    11. Danilova I.V., Savelyeva I.P., Rezepin A.V., Kilina I.P. (2021) Mezhregionalnyye svyazi v sisteme faktorov prostranstvennogo razvitiya spetsializatsiy regionov: analiz makrozon monoprofilnykh regionov. Regionalnyye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki, 3 (125), 53–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2021-3-53-66

    12. Dzhurka N.G. (2018) Prostranstvennaya kontsentratsiya promyshlennogo proizvodstva v Rossii: testirovaniye effekta vnutrennego rynka. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika, 3, 19–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2018.3.019-042

    13. Dzhurka N.G. (2022) Analiz strukturnykh sdvigov: obzor prostranstvennykh versiy. Regionalistika, 9 (5), 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14530/reg.2022.5.5

    14. Druzhinin P.V. (2023) Razvitiye ekonomiki regionov Severo-Zapadnogo federalnogo okruga v usloviyakh migratsii naseleniya v Sankt-Peterburgskuyu aglomeratsiyu. Baltiyskiy region, 15 (3), 100–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-6

    15. Zamyatina N.Yu., Pilyasov A.N. (2017) Kontseptsiya blizosti: zarubezhnyy opyt i perspektivy primeneniya v Rossii. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya geograficheskaya, 3, 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S037324441703001X

    16. Zemtsov S.P., Barinova V.A., Muradov A.K. (2016) Faktory regionalnoy innovatsionnoy aktivnosti: analiz teoreticheskikh i empiricheskikh issledovaniy. Innovatsii, 5 (211), 41–51.

    17. Zemtsov S.P., Smelov Yu.A. (2018) Faktory regionalnogo razvitiya v Rossii: geografiya, chelovecheskiy kapital ili politika regionov. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii, 40 (4), 84–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-4

    18. Zyuzin A.V., Demidova O.A., Dolgopyatova T.G. (2020) Lokalizatsiya i diversifikatsiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki: regionalnyye i otraslevyye osobennosti. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika, 16 (2), 39–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.2.039-069

    19. Ivanova O.P. (2018) Vzaimovliyaniye proizvodstvennoy spetsializatsii regiona i vnutriregionalnykh klasterov. Ekonomika regiona, 14 (4), 1207–1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.170-59/2018-4-12

    20. Kaneva M.A., Untura G.A. (2021) Modeli otsenki vliyaniya ekonomiki znaniy na ekonomicheskiy rost i innovatsii regionov (otv. red. V.I. Suslov), Novosibirsk: IEOPP SO RAN.

    21. Kotov A.V. (2021) Prostranstvennyy analiz strukturnykh sdvigov kak instrument issledovaniya dinamiki ekonomicheskogo razvitiya makroregionov Rossii. Ekonomika regiona, 17 (3), 755–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-3

    22. Makhotayeva M.Yu., Nikolayev M.A. (2025) Otsenka effektivnosti dostizheniya tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta. π-Economy, 18 (3), 69–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.18304

    23. Melnikova L.V. (2021) Prostranstvennyy analiz dinamiki strukturnykh sdvigov v ekonomike rossiyskikh regionov v 2004–2019 gg. Region: Ekonomika i sotsiologiya, 3 (111), 54–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20210303

    24. Mikhaylov A.S., Maksimenko D.D., Maksimenko M.R. (2024) Prostranstvennyye i strukturnyye zakonomernosti v raspredelenii nauchno-tekhnologicheskoy, innovatsionnoy i proizvodstvennoy deyatelnosti v Rossii. Baltiyskiy region, 16 (2), 41–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2024-2-3

    25. Nikolayev M.A. (2022) Riski i ugrozy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regionov Rossii v usloviyakh tsifrovoy ekonomiki. Regionalnaya ekonomika i upravleniye, 4 (72), art. no. 7212.

    26. Rastvortseva S.N. (2020) Innovatsionnyy put izmeneniya trayektorii predshestvuyushchego razvitiya ekonomiki regiona. Ekonomika regiona, 16 (1), 28–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.170-59/2020-1-3

    27. Sibirskaya Ye.V., Oveshnikova L.V., Shakirova D.F. (2021) Strategicheskoye planirovaniye razvitiya obrabatyvayushchikh proizvodstv Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Federalizm, 26 (3), 75–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-3-75-104

    28. Ukrainskiy V.N. (2011) Sovremennaya frantsuzskaya prostranstvennaya ekonomika: teoriya blizosti i tipologizatsiya lokalizovannykh ekonomicheskikh sistem. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika, 2, 92–126.

    29. Khaskel D., Uestleyk S. (2024) Kapitalizm bez kapitala: podyem nematerialnoy ekonomiki, monografiya, M.: ID VShE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2727-6

    30. Peryshkin M.O., Shkarupeta Ye.V. (2024) Setevyye regionalnyye struktury kak drayvery formirovaniya intellektualnogo tsifrovogo tekhnopolisa v Industrii 5.0. π-Economy, 17 (5), 115–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.17507

    31. Yagolnitser M.A. (2024) Osobennosti institutsionalnykh mekhanizmov innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionov Rossii. Region: Ekonomika i sotsiologiya, 4 (124), 300–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20240412

    32. Boschma R. (2005) Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39 (1), 61–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous articleNext article