System modeling in economics: evolution of approaches and development prospects

Economic & mathematical methods and models
Authors:
Abstract:

The goal of this paper is to analyze currently existing approaches to modeling economic systems from the perspective of how they incorporate various aspects of their functioning into the modeled domain and what practical recommendations in the field of economic systems management are developed on this basis. This analysis is conducted in order to further create from the existing approaches a new integrated approach, within which it will be possible to construct models of economic systems that are more comprehensive in covering aspects of their operation for the development of more comprehensive strategies for managing these systems. The study summarizes the features of four existing approaches to system modeling of economic phenomena, within which the objects of study and practical management influence can be: the processes of restoring equilibrium in an economic system in response to disturbances (D. Forrester's system dynamics), the organization of interactions between its subsystems (G.B. Kleiner's economic tetrads), the combination of management functions in a system during a change in the phases of its life cycle (I. Adizes's PAEI model) and the dissemination of the results of an economic system's work in the external environment (Bass-Rogers diffusion model). An approach to describing economic systems has been developed that integrates the principles of the four previously analyzed approaches. Within this framework, economic system management is proposed to be structured taking into account the fact that the system's product gradually encompasses new consumer groups, while the economic system itself simultaneously moves through the phases of its life cycle, each characterized by its own mechanism for restoring systemic equilibrium, a distinct distribution of roles between subsystems and the need for distinct combinations of management functions. Thus, the contours of a general strategy for managing economic systems are formed based on a more multifaceted model representation. The developed approach to modeling economic systems and formulating management strategies for them is also integrated with the system-wide law of the spiral development of S-shaped life cycles. The main principle of this approach is the need to ensure the continuity of individual life cycles of the economic system, each of which is managed according to the model described in the previous section. The obtained results provide the basis for detailing the developed approach as applied to economic systems with different specificities.

  • References

    1. Vasiliev Y.S., Volkova V.N., Kozlov V.N. (2022) Origins and Prospects of Systems Theory. In: System Analysis in Engineering and Control. SAEC 2021 (eds. Y.S. Vasiliev, N.D. Pankratova, V.N. Volkova, O.D. Shipunova, N.N. Lyabakh), Cham: Springer, 3–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-98832-6_1

    2. Kleyner G.B. (2024) Sistemnaya paradigma i teoriya tekhnologiy. Terra Economicus, 22 (4), 6–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2024-22-4-6-18

    3. Drogobytskij I.N. (2022) Systematicity of organizational management. System Research & Information Technologies, 3, 51–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/srit.2308-8893.2020.3.04

    4. Volkova V.N., Leonova A.E., Romanova E.V., Chernyy Y.Y. (2021) Engineering as a Coordinating Method for the Development of the Organization and Society. In: Knowledge in the Information Society. PCSF 2020. CSIS 2020 (eds. D. Bylieva, A. Nordmann, O. Shipunova, V. Volkova), Cham: Springer, 12–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65857-1_2

    5. Volkova V.N., Fleishman B.S., Tarasenko F.P., Loginova A.V. (2021) Further Development of Potential Feasibility Theory for Complicated Systems According to the Unified General-System Principle. In: Knowledge in the Information Society. PCSF 2020. CSIS 2020 (eds. D. Bylieva, A. Nordmann, O. Shipunova, V. Volkova), Cham: Springer, 446–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65857-1_37

    6. Volkova V.N. (2023) Istoki i perspektivy nauk o sistemakh, monografiya, M.: Izdatelstvo «Kurs».

    7. Şenalp Ö., Midgley G., Maracha V., Shchepetova S. (2023) Resurrecting Bogdanov on the 150th anniversary of his birth. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 40 (2), 285–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2941

    8. Uandykova M., Stepanova D., Shchepetova S., Ratkin L. (2021) Applying of system models in the progress of formation and implementation of programs for innovative development of regions. Nexo Revista Científica, 34 (4), 1322–1343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5377/nexo.v34i04.12668

    9. Shchepetova S.Y., Burukina O.A. (2020) The Role of Cyber-Physical Systems in Human Societies: Systemic Principles of Organizational Management. In: Cyber-Physical Systems and Control. CPS&C 2019 (eds. D. Arseniev, L. Overmeyer, H. Kälviäinen, B. Katalinić), Cham: Springer, 709–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34983-7_70

    10. Akimova T.A. (2012) O metodicheskikh podkhodakh k organizatsii upravleniya ustoychivym razvitiyem regiona. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika, 26 (257), 2–9.

    11. Kleyner G.B. (2023) Sistemnaya metodologiya Aleksandra Bogdanova v kontekste sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo mirovozzreniya. Voprosy ekonomiki, 3, 24–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-3-24-39

    12. Kleyner G.B. (2008) Sistemnaya paradigma i sistemnyy menedzhment. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta, 6 (3), 27–50.

    13. Adizes I. (2022) Idealnyy rukovoditel: pochemu im nelzya stat i chto iz etogo sleduyet, M.: Alpina Pablisher.

    14. Adizes I. (2014) Upravleniye zhiznennym tsiklom korporatsiy, M.: Mann, Ivanov i Farber.

    15. Drogobytskiy I.N. (2022) Energy and Power of Management. In: System Analysis in Engineering and Control. SAEC 2021 (eds. Y.S. Vasiliev, N.D. Pankratova, V.N. Volkova, O.D. Shipunova, N.N. Lyabakh), Cham: Springer, 250–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98832-6_22

    16. Lebedeva Ye.A. (2015) Upravleniye organizatsiyey s pomoshchyu zhiznennykh tsiklov I.K. Adizesa. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye nauki i gumanitarnyye issledovaniya, 7, 41–44.

    17. Leonov M.Ye., Volkova T.A. (2024) Sopostavitelnyy analiz zhiznennogo tsikla organizatsii po modeli I. Adizesa i zhiznennogo tsikla proyekta v ramkakh proyektnooriyentirovannoy metodologii upravleniya. Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 9 (4), 626–646. DOI: https://doi. org/10.55186/2413046X_2024_9_4_224

    18. Sadykov A.S. (2023) Analiz stadii «Yunost» v modeli «Zhiznennyy tsikl kompanii» Itskhaka Adizesa na primere krupnykh mirovykh brendov. Yevraziyskiy Soyuz Uchenykh. Seriya: Ekonomicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, 9 (112), 12–15.

    19. Mekhdi F. (2022) Teoriya diffuzii innovatsiy. Scientific Collection “InterConf+”, 27 (133), 25–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.11.2022.002

    20. Krasnov A.S. (2023) Marketingovaya deyatelnost pri vyvode novogo tovara na rynok. Vestnik VGUIT, 84 (3), 466–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2022-3-470-475

    21. Lisafyev S.V., Sekerin V.D. (2012) Osnovnyye etapy razvitiya teorii diffuzii innovatsiy. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitiye), 8, 74–77.

    22. Uzhakhova A.M. (2019) Modeli prognozirovaniya sprosa na innovatsionnyy produkt. Audit i finansovyy analiz, 5, 53–58.

    23. Priven A.I., Kynin A.T. (2014) Ob evolyutsii nauchnykh modeley. [online] Available at: http://www.metodolog.ru/node/945 [Accessed 04.10.2025]. (in Russian)

    24. Gerasimova Ye.B. (2019) Fenomenologiya standartizatsii ekonomicheskogo analiza, M.: Izdatelstvo «KnoRus».

    25. Gumerov M.F. (2018) Novyye podkhody i modeli organizatsionnogo upravleniya v usloviyakh sovremennoy ekonomiki, M.: EKTs «Professor».

    26. Gumerov M.F. (2025) Printsip S-obraznogo razvitiya sistem i yego znacheniye v menedzhmente na osnove sistemnogo podkhoda. Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovaniye, 1, 256–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33983/2075-1826-2025-1-256-264

    27. Afanasyev A.A. (2024) Stankostroyeniye v Rossii: kurs na tekhnologicheskiy suverenitet. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki, 14 (3), 769–788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.14.3.121156

    28. Serebrennyy V.V. (2023) Sostoyaniye del v stankostroyenii Rossii. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 93 (1), 3–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587323010085

    29. Malkova T.B., Yelenev K.S. (2023) Strategicheskiy kontekst razvitiya stankostroyeniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Ekonomika, predprinimatelstvo i pravo, 13 (9), 3329–3346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.13.9.119201

    30. Gumerov M.F., Yelenev K.S., Kudryashov S.A. (2025) Povysheniye roli intellektualnoy deyatelnosti v rabote stankostroitelnykh predpriyatiy: sistemnyy podkhod. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii, 28 (2), 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2025-28(2)-39-48

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Previous article