<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="ru">
  <front xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>π-Economy</journal-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>π-Economy</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2782-6015</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">6</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18721/JE.19306</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Assessment of the economic effects of structural changes in the manufacturing industry of Russia</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>Оценка экономических эффектов структурных изменений в обрабатывающей промышленности России</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Vasiliev</surname>
            <given-names>Mikhail</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-30">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>83</fpage>
      <lpage>99</lpage>
      <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://economy.spbstu.ru/userfiles/files/articles/2026/3/06_vasilev.pdf"/>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>The article examines methodological issues of assessing the economic effects of structural changes in the manufacturing industry. The aim of the study is to assess the economic effects of structural changes in the manufacturing industry of the Russian Federation in 2020–2024, namely, to evaluate the contribution of the redistribution of average headcount of employees across technological groups of the manufacturing industry to the change in labor productivity. The methodological basis of the study is the works of S. Fabricant, B. Massell, M. Syrquin, M.P. Timmer and A. Szirmai, as well as studies on structural transformation and technological dynamics in industry. The scientific novelty lies in the modification of methods for analyzing structural changes in industry and adapting the shift-share approach to the assessment of the economic effects of structural changes in the average headcount of employees across technological groups of manufacturing industries. The author modifies the methodology of Timmer and Szirmai, in which the change in productivity is decomposed into the within-sector effect, the static structural effect, and the dynamic interaction effect. The difference of the modified methodology lies in applying this decomposition logic to the assessment of structural changes in the manufacturing industry, taking into account the grouping of its industries according to OECD technological groups. Another difference is the choice of time intervals for the calculation. In the Timmer and Szirmai study, labor productivity decomposition is carried out over large intervals, ranging from five to ten years depending on the country and period. This article uses a chain annual calculation for 2020–2024 over the intervals 2020–2021, 2021–2022, 2022–2023, and 2023–2024. This allows tracking the change in the contribution of structural redistribution not only over the entire period, but also over individual years. The empirical base is formed from Rosstat data for 24 types of manufacturing activities, aggregated into four OECD technological groups. It is shown that the structure of the average headcount of employees by technological group changed moderately in 2020–2024. The share of high-technology industries increased, while the share of low-technology industries decreased. The structure of the volume of shipped goods differs significantly from the employment structure: the largest share of shipment volume is accounted for by medium-low- technology industries. Labor productivity, measured as the volume of shipped goods per employee, increased across all technological groups. It was established that the increase in labor productivity was mainly driven by the within-sector effect calculated at the level of technological groups. The static structural effect at the level of technological groups was positive but significantly smaller than the within-sector component, while the dynamic interaction effect was minimal.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>manufacturing industry</kwd>
        <kwd>structural changes</kwd>
        <kwd>economic effect</kwd>
        <kwd>labor productivity</kwd>
        <kwd>shift-share analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>Russian industry</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Timmer M.P., Szirmai A. (2000) Productivity Growth in Asian Manufacturing: The Structural Bonus Hypothesis Examined. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11 (4), 371–392. DOI: 10.1016/ S0954-349X(00)00023-0</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Voskoboynikov I., Gimpelson V. (2015) Productivity Growth, Structural Change and Informality: The Case of Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 11, 30–61. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-30-61</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kazinets L.S. (1969) Izmerenie strukturnykh sdvigov v ekonomike [Measuring structural shifts in the economy], Moscow: Ekonomika.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sukharev O.S. (2020) Strukturnaia i tekhnologicheskaia dinamika rossiiskoi ekonomiki [Structural and technological dynamics of the Russian economy], Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kotov A.V. (2021) Spatial Shift-Share Analysis as a Tool for Studying the Economic Development of Russia’s Macroregions. Economy of Region, 17 (3), 755–768. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-3</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ovchinnikova A.V., Bogachev E.A. (2024) Industrial Structural Changes in the Economy of the Udmurt Republic. Economy of Regions, 20 (1), 189–204. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-13</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Serova N.A., Skufyna T.P. (2023) Analyzing the Structural Development of Industrial Production in the Regions of the Russian Arctic. The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order, 1, 108–119. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.1.2023.79.007</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Glazyrina I.P., Zabelina I.A., Faleychik L.M. (2025) Transformation of the Manufacturing Industry Structure in the East of Russia during a Period of Economic Shocks. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences, 18 (12), 2461–2477.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Palash S.V. (2018) Analysis of the structural dynamics in the manufacturing industry at the natio- nal and regional levels. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 11 (1), 64–76. DOI: 10.18721/JE.11106</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Palash S.V. (2019) Modeling the economic effects of import substitution in russian manufacturing industry. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 12 (1), 59–69. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12105</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Simachev Iu.V., Fediunina A.A., Kuzyk M.G. (2022) Novye kontury promyshlennoi politiki. Doklad NIU VSHE [New Contours of Industrial Policy. HSE Report.]. XXIII Iasinskaia (Aprel'skaia) mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsiia po problemam razvitiia ekonomiki i obshchestva [Proceeding of the 23rd Yasinskaya (April) International Scientific Conference on Problems of Economic and Social Development], 1–75. [online] Available at: https://indpolicy.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/863520529.pdf?ysclid= mra9t5hb6y359166189 [Accessed 07.07.2026]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Syrquin M. (1988) Chapter 7. Patterns of Structural Change. In: Handbook of Development Economics (eds. H. Chenery, T.N. Srinivasan), 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 203–273. DOI: 10.1016/S1573-4471 (88)01010-1</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Herrendorf B., Rogerson R., Valentinyi Á. (2014) Chapter 6. Growth and Structural Transformation. In: Handbook of Economic Growth (eds. P. Aghion, S.N. Durlauf), 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 855–941. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00006-9</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Duarte M., Restuccia D. (2010) The Role of the Structural Transformation in Aggregate Productivity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (1), 129–173.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Acemoglu D., Guerrieri V. (2008) Capital Deepening and Nonbalanced Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 116 (3), 467–498. DOI: 10.1086/589523</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Duernecker G., Sanchez-Martinez M. (2023) Structural Change and Productivity Growth in Europe – Past, Present and Future. European Economic Review, 151, art. no. 104329. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104329</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Comin D., Lashkari D., Mestieri M. (2021) Structural Change with Long-Run Income and Price Effects. Econometrica, 89 (1), 311–374. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA16317</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fabricant S. (1942) Employment in Manufacturing, 1899–1939: An Analysis of Its Relation to the Volume of Production, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Massell B.F. (1961) A Disaggregated View of Technical Change. Journal of Political Economy, 69 (6), 547–557. DOI: 10.1086/258575</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Syrquin M. (1984) Resource Allocation and Productivity Growth. In: Economic Structure and Performance: Essays in Honor of Hollis B. Chenery (eds. M. Syrquin, L. Taylor, L.E. Westphal), Orlando: Academic Press, 75–101.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mensah E., Owusu S., Foster-McGregor N., Szirmai A. (2023) Structural Change, Productivity Growth and Labour Market Turbulence in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 32 (3), 175–208. DOI: 10.1093/jae/ejac010</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Konte M., Kouamé W.A., Mensah E.B. (2022) Structural Reforms and Labor Productivity Growth in Developing Countries: Intra or Inter-Reallocation Channel? The World Bank Economic Re- view, 36 (3), 646–669. DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhac002</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Djidonou G.R., Foster-McGregor N. (2022) Stagnant Manufacturing Growth in India: The Role of the Informal Economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 63, 528–543. DOI: 10.1016/j. strueco.2022.07.007</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kruse H., Mensah E., Sen K., de Vries G. (2023) A Manufacturing (Re)Naissance? Industrialization in the Developing World. IMF Economic Review, 71 (2), 439–473. DOI: 10.1057/s41308-022- 00183-7</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Erumban A.A., de Vries G.J. (2024) Structural Change and Poverty Reduction in Developing Economies. World Development, 181, art. no. 106674. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106674</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hamilton C., de Vries G.J. (2025) The Structural Transformation of Transition Economies. World Development, 191, art. no. 106977. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106977</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kuosmanen T., Kuosmanen N. (2021) Structural Change Decomposition of Productivity without Share Weights. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 120–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.011</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Galindo-Rueda F., Verger F. (2016) OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&amp;D Intensity. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Art. no. 2016/04. DOI: 10.1787/ 5jlv73sqqp8r-en</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pavitt K. (1984) Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, 13 (6), 343–373. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">OECD (2023) Decomposition of Aggregate Labour Productivity Growth into Industry Contributions – Methodology Applied in the OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2023. [online] Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/support-materials/2023/02/oecd-compendium-of-productivity-indicators-2023_bdbeba7d/oecd-compendium-of-productivity-indicators-2023-methodology.pdf [Accessed 07.07.2026]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">OECD (2025) OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2025, Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/b024d9e1-en</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal"> </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
