<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="ru">
  <front xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>π-Economy</journal-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>π-Economy</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2782-6015</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">5</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18721/JE.19205</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Assessment and justification of directions for improving the efficiency of regional scientific, technological and innovation policy</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>Оценка и обоснование направлений повышения эффективности региональной научно-технологической и инновационной политики</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Nikolaev</surname>
            <given-names>Mikhail</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>fef-sp.ucoz.ru</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Makhotaeva</surname>
            <given-names>Marina</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>makhotaeva@mail.ru</email>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-28">
        <day>28</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>85</fpage>
      <lpage>105</lpage>
      <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://economy.spbstu.ru/userfiles/files/articles/2026/2/05_nikolaev_mahotaeva.pdf"/>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>The current stage of development of the Russian economy is characterized by the priority of achieving technological sovereignty. An important role in addressing this challenge is assigned to the regional level, which brings to the fore a set of issues related to improving the effectiveness of scientific, technological, and innovation (STI) policy at the regional level. The aim of the study is to assess and substantiate directions for improving the effectiveness of regional STI policy. An analysis of scientific literature reveals that the attributes of this policy include its goals, main implementation areas, principles, and indicators. To evaluate STI policy, the study employs indicators such as “share of research and development expenditures in GRP” and “proportion of organizations engaged in technological innovations”. To investigate the correlation between the indicators, a clustering of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was performed, resulting in the identification of six groups of regions that differ in R&amp;D expenditures and innovation activity levels. Only 13 regions, forming the first and second clusters, demonstrate relatively balanced development of the scientific and technological sector. However, even in these regions, the level of organizational innovation activity remains low. The largest cluster (30 regions) includes regions that are lagging in STI policy, exhibiting low levels of both technological innovation and R&amp;D expenditures. The development of manufacturing industries is substantiated as the main direction for improving the effectiveness of regional STI policy. Using the shift-share analysis method, an assessment of regional factors of their competitiveness was carried out. Based on these factors, the regions have been divided into five groups. Positive development factors for manufacturing industries were found in regions of the first and second groups (19 regions in total). Nevertheless, most of these regions are not among the industrially developed ones. The largest group (40 regions), which includes leading manufacturing centers, exhibits neutral competitiveness factors. To assess the relationship between regional competitiveness factors and their STI development indicators, a typology of regions was created based on indicators of regional competitiveness factors, R&amp;D, and innovation. It is worth noting that regions with relatively high performance in science and innovation exhibit neutral and negative local factors affecting the development of manufacturing industries. This situation highlights the existence of systemic issues in the development of manufacturing industries in the Russian Federation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>scientific</kwd>
        <kwd>technological and innovation policy</kwd>
        <kwd>R&amp;D</kwd>
        <kwd>manufacturing</kwd>
        <kwd>regional potential</kwd>
        <kwd>technological innovation</kwd>
        <kwd>technological sovereignty</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pizelkin V.M., Gasanov E.A. (2021) Osobennosti realizatsii innovatsionnoy politiki v regione v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ekonomiki. Tsifrovizatsiya – drayver ekonomicheskogo rosta v postpandemicheskiy period, 20–25. DOI: 10.38161/978-5-7823-0744-8-2021-020-025</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ushkho A. (2025) Metodicheskiye instrumenty razvitiya innovatsionnoy politiki v regione. International Conference on Technology and Global Solutions, 93–98.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Golova I.M. (2024) Soglasovaniye regionalnykh innovatsionnykh protsessov s prioritetom obespecheniya tekhniko-tekhnologicheskoy konkurentosposobnosti RF. Ekonomika regiona, 20 (1), 63–75. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-5</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gusev A., Yurevich M. (2019) Problemy «tsifrovykh» tseley gosudarstvennoy nauchno- tekhnicheskoy politiki v regionakh. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, 1, 33–51. DOI: 10.31857/S0207367600-03827-8</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Golova I.M. (2022) Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy potentsial regionov kak osnova tekhnologicheskoy nezavisimosti RF. Ekonomika regiona, 18 (4), 1062–1074. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-4-7</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Golova I.M. (2021) Ekosistemnyy podkhod k upravleniyu innovatsionnymi protsessami v rossiyskikh regionakh. Ekonomika regiona, 17 (4), 1346–1360. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-21</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ruyga I.R., Kovzunova Ye.S., Korpacheva L.N. (2022) Otsenka effektivnosti realizatsii innovatsionnoy politiki v regionakh rossiyskoy federatsii na osnove ispolzovaniya metoda klasterizatsii. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika, 20 (2 (497)), 259–288. DOI: 10.24891/re.20.2.259</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Doroshenko Yu.A., Starikova M.S., Ryapukhina V.N. (2022) Vyyavleniye modeley industrialno-innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionalnykh ekonomicheskikh sistem. Ekonomika regiona, 18 (1), 78–91. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-6</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Belyakov G.P., Bagdasaryan N.A. (2023) Metodicheskiy podkhod k formirovaniyu gosudarstvennykh programm nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya subyektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Regionalnaya ekonomika i upravleniye: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 3 (75), art. no. 7505. DOI: 10.24412/1999-2645-2023-375-10</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Danilchenkova O.G. (2022) Gosudarstvennaya politika podderzhki innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti malogo i srednego predprinimatelstva, kak faktor sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov. Modern Economy Success, 5, 19–24.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zemtsov S.P., Barinova V.A. (2016) Smena paradigmy regionalnoy innovatsionnoy politiki v Rossii: ot vyravnivaniya k «umnoy spetsializatsii». Voprosy ekonomiki, 10, 65–81. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-10-65-81</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zvorykina T.I., Pobedinskiy P.V. (2025) Rol nauchno-tekhnicheskoy politiki regionov i standartizatsii v obespechenii tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta. III Nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Standartizatsiya: trayektoriya nauki», 6 (87), S. 375–380.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pobedin A.A. (2025) Innovatsionnaya aktivnost i ekonomicheskoye razvitiye regiona: ARDL-analiz na primere Sverdlovskoy oblasti. R-Economy, 11 (1), 49–59. DOI: 10.15826/recon.2025.11.1.003</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rezepin A.V., Danilova I.V., Telyubayeva A.Zh. (2025) Otsenka svyazannosti industrialnogo prostranstva regionov kak faktora formirovaniya promyshlennogo suvereniteta Rossii. R-Economy, 11 (3), 340–355. DOI: 10.15826/recon.2025.11.3.018</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zabashtanskiy M.M., Zakharin S.V., Rogovoy A.V. (2020) Finansirovaniye investitsionnoy i innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti promyshlennykh predpriyatiy v kontekste perekhoda natsionalnogo khozyaystva na model ustoychivogo razvitiya. Ekonomicheskiy vestnik universiteta, 45, 184–195. DOI: 10.31470/2306-546X-2020-45-184-195</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Makhotayeva M.Yu., Nikolayev M.A., Demidova S.Ye. (2025) Finansovyye i ekonomicheskiye faktory obespecheniya tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta. Finansy, 4, 50–58.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sukhovey A.F., Golova I.M. (2020) Differentsiatsiya strategiy innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionov kak usloviye povysheniya effektivnosti sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy politiki v RF. Ekonomika regiona, 16 (4), 1302–1317. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-20</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zadumkin K.A., Kondakov I.A. (2010) Metodika sravnitelnoy otsenki nauchno-tekhnicheskogo potentsiala regiona. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, 4 (12), 86–100.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zadumkin K.A., Kondakov I.A. (2010) Regionalnaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya politika: osnovy formirovaniya i monitoring realizatsii. Problemy razvitiya territorii, 3 (49), 14–19.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dankov S.O. (2025) K voprosu otsenki innovatsionnoy deyatelnosti regionov. Regionalnyye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki, 1 (171), 57–71. DOI: 10.26726/rppe2025v1otioa</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rostovskaya T.K., Zolotareva O.A. (2022) Perekhod k novomu tekhnologicheskomu ukladu – determinanta rosta blagosostoyaniya naseleniya regionov Rossii. Ekonomika regiona, 18 (3), 623–637. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-3-1</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yegorov N.Ye., Vasilyeva N.V. (2022) Otsenka urovnya innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionov na osnove ekonometricheskoy modeli «Troynaya spiral» i rossiyskogo regionalnogo innovatsionnogo indeksa. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki, 12 (3), 1697–1710. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.3.115181</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Etzkowitz H. (2003) Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42 (3), 293–337. DOI: 10.1177/05390184030423002</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Golova I.M. (2010) Problemy formirovaniya regionalnoy innovatsionnoy strategii. Ekonomika regiona, 3 (23), 77–85.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Amitov R.T. (2025) Metodicheskiye aspekty opredeleniya stepeni innovatsionnogo razvitiya regionov iskhodya iz effektivnosti realizatsii innovatsionnoy politiki. Modern Economy Success, 3, 97–107.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ruyga I.R. (2017) Formirovaniye sistemy kriteriyev i pokazateley otsenki innovatsionnoy ustoychivosti na regionalnom urovne. Innovatsionnoye razvitiye ekonomiki, 6 (42), 156–163.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Makhotayeva M.Yu., Nikolayev M.A. (2025) Otsenka effektivnosti dostizheniya tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta. π-Economy, 18 (3), 69–81. DOI: 10.18721/JE.18304</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Melenkina S.A., Uzhegov A.O. (2024) Strukturnyye sdvigi v zanyatosti industrialnogo regiona: k voprosu o povyshenii urovnya zhizni naseleniya. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika», 19 (2), 164–185. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2024-2-164-185</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
